Comparative Reliability And Validity Of Individual versus Composite Scoring With Numeric Pain Rating Scale
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 38
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Numeric pain rating scale
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of composite pain scoring compared to individual 24-hour recall ratings and current rating on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain undergoing cervical therapeutic exercises.
Current literature has been limited to a maximum of 4 days of ratings, with limited exploration into extending the duration of assessment beyond this timeframe
There is a need to investigate the impact of extending pain ratings over a duration of 6 days on the reliability and validity of both individual and composite scores
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 50.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •With chronic mechanical neck pain of more than 3 months.
排除标准
- •Individuals with post-traumatic neck pain Any recent neck surgeries in 3 years Radiating pain.
- •Unable to understand Hindi, English, Telugu.
结局指标
主要结局
Numeric pain rating scale
时间窗: 6 times within a week before the treatment and 6 times within a week after treatment
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Nayana Chode
Manipal Academy of Higher Eduacation