Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury
- Conditions
- Obstetric; Injury
- Interventions
- Other: Constraint induced movement therapyOther: Conventional physical therapy treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT05411731
- Lead Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to increase and improve the use of affected extremity in obstetric brachial plexus palsy children while restricting the use of less affected arm and the purpose was to improve the function, Range of motion and disability in affected arm of children with brachial plexus injury.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 16
- 3 to 10 years
- Both genders will be included
- Deficiency of shoulder abduction and external rotation
- Who can follows command
- uncontrolled seizures
- Orthopedic and/or neurological surgery.
- A visual impairment interfering with treatment/testing.
- Unable to actively engage in assessment process
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Constraint induced movement therapy Constraint induced movement therapy patients of this group will receive the same treatment along with constraint induced movement therapy Conventional physical therapy treatment Conventional physical therapy treatment Patients in this group will receive conventional physical therapy i.e. stretching, strengthening exercises, Aeroplan positioning
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mallet grading system 4 weeks The Mallet grading system is a commonly used functional scoring system to assess shoulder abduction/external rotation deficits in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. One feature of the Mallet score is that each grade is translated in to certain degree of deficiencies in both shoulder abduction and external rotation. A scale of 1 to 5 is used to evaluate shoulder abduction, global external rotation, and hand to neck, hand to back, and hand to mouth positions.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Upper extremity function index 4th week It is a self-administered questionnaire which measures disability in people with upper extremity orthopaedic conditions. The questionnaire lists 20 activities and the patient gives a score to each based on the difficulty they have completing that activity. It is evaluated on a 5-point scale that refers to the perceived difficulty in performing the mentioned action:
* Extreme difficulty or unable to perform activity (0 points);
* Quite a bit of difficulty (1 point);
* Moderate difficulty (2 points);
* A little bit of difficulty (3 points);
* No difficulty (4 points).
The overall Upper extremity function index (UEFI) result ranges between 0 and 80, where 0 indicates most severe limitation and 80 suggests least limitation. Changes from baseline function of affected extremity was given by this tool.goniometer 4th week changes from the baseline ROM of shoulder abduction and external rotation as well as elbow ranges was measured by goniometer was measured by can evaluate both active as well as passive range of motion.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bakhtawar Amin Trust Teaching Hospital
🇵🇰Multān, Punjab, Pakistan