The Effectiveness of a Physiotherapy Technique in Patients With Chronic Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorder
- Conditions
- Myofascial Pain SyndromeTemporomandibular Disorder
- Registration Number
- NCT03619889
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Brief Summary
Participants with chronic orofacial pain caused by masticatory and neck muscles will be distributed in two groups, both followed with the same occlusal and self-care treatment. The experimental group will receive 5 sessions of physiotherapy applying a specific pressure on the trigger points while the control group will receive placebo through a simulation of the same technique. Orofacial perceived pain, pain pressure thresholds, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, cervical disability, depression and anxiety will be evaluated at baseline, immediately after treatment and 3 months later.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
- Patients ≥18 years.
- Patients diagnosed of myofascial TMD with at least one TrP with referred pain.
- TMD patients with a current complaint of myofascial pain with more than 6 months of evolution.
- Patients with myofascial TMD initially treated with splint currently used, that has not been modified in the last 6 months, without improvement.
- Patients treated with occlusal splint recently modified.
- Patients with acute TMJ diseases.
- Patients with systemic disease, neurological and muscular diseases.
- Patients with psychiatric or psychological disorders.
- Patients with cervical disc hernia and acute whiplash injury.
- Changes in the painkillers intake during the experiment.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes of Perceived Pain Between Three Time Points (Baseline, Post-treatment, and 3 Months Later) and Between Groups (Sham Simulation and Pressure Release Technique) Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The Visual Analogue Scale (0-10) was used, 0 representing no pain/better outcome, and 10 representing unbearable pain/worst outcome.
the clinical minimum relevance outcome is at least a change of 1.2 points in the scale.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in the Neck Disability Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The Neck Disability Index was used (0-50), with 0 representing no disability neck/best outcome and 50 maximum disability neck/worst outcome.
Changes of Pain Pressure Thresholds Sternal Sternocleidomastoid Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later An algometer Wagner Force One FDX 50 was used, measured in kgf/cm\^2, with 0 representing the lowest pain pressure threshold/worst outcome and as higher pain pressure threshold/ as a better outcome.
Changes in the Kinesiophobia Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia -11 was used (0-44), with 0 representing no kinesiophobia/best outcome and 44 representing the highest level of kinesiphobia/worst outcome.
Changes in the Trait Anxiety Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The State-Trait Anxiety Index was used, lower values represent a better outcome. State and Trait were evaluated individually, range of scores for each subtest is 20-80, with 20 representing no trait anxiety/best outcome and 80 representing the highest level of trait anxiety/worst outcome.
Changes in the Range of the Opening of the Mouth Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later A calibrator Dentaurum München was used, measured in millimetres, with 0 representing no opening/worst outcome and as higher values/as a better outcome.
Changes in the Catastrophizing Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was used (0-52), with 0 representing no catastrophizing/best outcome and 52 representing the highest level of catastrophizing/worst outcome.
Changes in the State Anxiety Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The State-Trait Anxiety Index was used, lower values represent a better outcome. State and Trait were evaluated individually, range of scores for each subtest is 20-80, with 20 representing no state anxiety/best outcome and 80 representing the highest level of state anxiety/worst outcome.
Changes of Pain Pressure Thresholds Superficial Masseter Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later An algometer Wagner Force One FDX 50 was used, measured in kgf/cm\^2, with 0 representing the lowest pain pressure threshold/worst outcome and as higher pain pressure threshold/ as a better outcome.
Changes of Pain Pressure Thresholds Anterior Temporalis Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later An algometer Wagner Force One FDX 50 was used, measured in kgf/cm\^2, with 0 representing the lowest pain pressure threshold/worst outcome and as higher pain pressure threshold/ as a better outcome.
Changes in the State Depression Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The State-Trait Depression Inventory was used, lower values represent a better outcome. State and Trait were evaluated individually, range of scores for each subtest is 20-80, with 20 representing no state depression/best outcome and 80 representing the highest level of state depression/worst outcome
Changes in the Trait Depression Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later The State-Trait Depression Inventory was used, lower values represent a better outcome. State and Trait were evaluated individually, range of scores for each subtest is 20-80, with 20 representing no Trait Depression/best outcome and 80 representing the highest level of Trait Depression/worst outcome
Changes of Pain Pressure Thresholds Upper Trapezius Change from baseline in the scale at post-treatment and at 3 months later An algometer Wagner Force One FDX 50 was used, measured in kgf/cm\^2, with 0 representing the lowest pain pressure threshold/worst outcome and as higher pain pressure threshold/ as a better outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Odontology Faculty. Complutense University of Madrid
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Odontology Faculty. Complutense University of Madrid🇪🇸Madrid, Spain