MedPath

Radiofrequency Versus Laser Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Neoplasms, Liver
Interventions
Procedure: percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
Procedure: percutaneous laser ablation
Registration Number
NCT01096914
Lead Sponsor
Cardarelli Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus percutaneous laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

Detailed Description

Percutaneous ablation is a safe and effective therapy for cirrhotic patients with HCC when resection or liver transplantation is not possible. Among the various percutaneous local ablative therapies, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has attracted the greatest interest because of its effectiveness and safety for single HCC ≤ 5.0cm or ≤3 HCC nodules ≤3cm. Some studies have shown that laser ablation (LA) may be as effective as RFA in the treatment of HCC. However, RFA and LA are different techniques and, in different cases (for example: size or site of HCC nodule), each of these procedures may have some advantages or disadvantages. Therefore there is the need for a prospective randomized controlled study to compare RFA and LA in patients with small HCC.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
140
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with unresectable HCC or who refused surgery
  • A solitary HCC ≤ 5.0cm in diameter, or multiple HCC ≤ 3 lesions, each ≤ 3.0cm in diameter
  • Child-Pugh class A or B
  • Platelet count correctable to > 40,000/mm3, INR correctable to < 2.0
  • No previous treatment of HCC
Exclusion Criteria
  • Other severe concomitant diseases that may reduce life expectancy
  • History of encephalopathy, refractory ascites or variceal bleeding
  • Vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results
  • Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardize the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Radiofrequencypercutaneous radiofrequency ablationpatients treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
laserpercutaneous laser ablationPatients treated with percutaneous laser ablation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Tumor responsefour weeks after treatment

Complete ablation of the HCC nodule, defined as absence of contrast enhancement of the nodule at CT or MRI imaging

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
time to local recurrence12 months after treatment

the time from complete tumor ablation to reappearance of arterial enhancement on CT or MRI either within a treated tumor or near its borders

overall survival12 months after last treatment

Time from randomization to death. Patients alive at the end of follow-up are censored.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Liver Unit - Cardarelli Hospital

🇮🇹

Naples, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath