MedPath

Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) Application in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects

Phase 4
Conditions
Sticky Bone
iPRF
Periodontal Defect
Interventions
Biological: bone substitute
Biological: Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF)
Registration Number
NCT05211362
Lead Sponsor
Al-Azhar University
Brief Summary

One of the main objectives of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of the tooth's supporting periodontal tissue to its original levels. The healing after non-surgical and conventional surgical methods is histologically characterized by a long junctional epithelium along the root surfaces. Therefore, reconstructive techniques are required. Although complete periodontal regeneration is unpredictable with any regenerative therapy currently used, so the objective of our trial is to get complete periodontal regeneration by using Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • No systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of therapy.
  • Good compliance with plaque control instructions following initial therapy.
  • Teeth involved were all vital with no mobility.
  • Each subject contributed a single predominately 2 or 3-wall intrabony interproximal defect around premolar or molar teeth without furcation involvement
  • Selected intrabony defects (IBD) measured from the alveolar crest to the defect base in diagnostic periapical radiographs of ≥ 3 mm, the width of ≥ 3 mm at its most coronal part, with no cratering that involve both mesial and distal surfaces of adjacent teeth.
  • Selected probing depth (PD) ≥ 6 mm and clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 4 mm at the site of intraosseous defects four weeks following initial cause-related therapy.
  • Availability for the follow-up and maintenance program; 8) absence of periodontal treatment during the previous year.
Exclusion Criteria

• Pregnant females.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
bone substitutebone substituteThe surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, bone graft substitute was heavily condensed into the intra bony defects. The flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.
Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF)Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF)The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, then the defect was filled with xenograft mixed with IPRF, Finally, the flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
change in clinical attachment levelbaseline, 3, and 6 months

change in clinical attachment level

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
change in interseptal bone widthbaseline, 3, and 6 months

change in interseptal bone width

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mah

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath