Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) Application in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects
- Conditions
- Sticky BoneiPRFPeriodontal Defect
- Interventions
- Biological: bone substituteBiological: Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF)
- Registration Number
- NCT05211362
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
One of the main objectives of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of the tooth's supporting periodontal tissue to its original levels. The healing after non-surgical and conventional surgical methods is histologically characterized by a long junctional epithelium along the root surfaces. Therefore, reconstructive techniques are required. Although complete periodontal regeneration is unpredictable with any regenerative therapy currently used, so the objective of our trial is to get complete periodontal regeneration by using Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) in Management of Periodontal Intrabony Defects.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
- No systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of therapy.
- Good compliance with plaque control instructions following initial therapy.
- Teeth involved were all vital with no mobility.
- Each subject contributed a single predominately 2 or 3-wall intrabony interproximal defect around premolar or molar teeth without furcation involvement
- Selected intrabony defects (IBD) measured from the alveolar crest to the defect base in diagnostic periapical radiographs of ≥ 3 mm, the width of ≥ 3 mm at its most coronal part, with no cratering that involve both mesial and distal surfaces of adjacent teeth.
- Selected probing depth (PD) ≥ 6 mm and clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 4 mm at the site of intraosseous defects four weeks following initial cause-related therapy.
- Availability for the follow-up and maintenance program; 8) absence of periodontal treatment during the previous year.
• Pregnant females.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description bone substitute bone substitute The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, bone graft substitute was heavily condensed into the intra bony defects. The flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures. Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) Sticky Bone and Repeated Injectable PRF (iPRF) The surgical treatment phase was initiated only if the subjects had a full-mouth dental plaque score of less than one and a test site plaque score of 0. Following mucoperiosteal flap reflection for one tooth on either side of the defect, all granulation tissue was removed from the defects by means of Gracey 7/8 metal curettes, and root surfaces were scaled and planed using hand and ultrasonic instruments, then the defect was filled with xenograft mixed with IPRF, Finally, the flap was replaced and closed with crossed horizontal and vertical internal mattress sutures.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method change in clinical attachment level baseline, 3, and 6 months change in clinical attachment level
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method change in interseptal bone width baseline, 3, and 6 months change in interseptal bone width
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mah
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt