Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03112278
NCT03112278UnknownNot Applicable

Clinical Evaluation of Ultrathin Occlusal Veneers for the Treatment of Severe Dental Erosion

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro0 sites10 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
10
Primary Endpoint
Survival of ultrathin occlusal veneers (ceramic and composite resin) for the restorative treatment of severe dental erosion.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Ultra-thin bonded posterior occlusal veneers represent a conservative alternative to traditional onlays and complete coverage crowns for the treatment of severe erosive lesions. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine whether ceramic and composite resin ultrathin occlusal veneers (0.6 - 1.0 mm thick) are effective in the rehabilitation of patients affected by moderate and severe dental erosion.

Detailed Description

Along with data collection, complete arch polyvinyl siloxane impressions are made to obtain accurate diagnostic casts. The occlusal relationship is recorded either at the maximum intercuspal position or centric relation (in cases occlusal space is needed for the restoration of the palatal of upper anterior teeth). An additive waxing is carried out for the eroded teeth. The waxed cast is then duplicated and poured with scannable stone.

An average occlusal clearance of 0.4 to 0.6 mm (central groove) to 1.0 to 1.3 mm (cusp tips) is generated by means of rotary diamond burs for the ultrathin occlusal veneers. A rubber dam is placed, and all areas of dentin exposure are ground with a coarse diamond rotary instrument at low speed (1500 rpm) and immediately sealed using a 3-step etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agent. The additive wax replica is scanned first for correlation (Cerec Bluecam; Sirona Dental Systems). The prepared teeth are then scanned in the same way.

The teeth are restored using Cerec AC with the Bluecam/MCXL CAD/CAM system (Sirona Dental Systems). By using the design tools of the software set in Biogeneric Copy, the restorations are designed by correlating the preparations with the anatomy of the additive waxing. The ultrathin occlusal veneers are milled either from composite resin blocks (LAVA Ultimate; 3M ESPE) or ceramic blocks (e.max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent) and polished mechanically with silicon carbide-impregnated brushes.

Restorations are then adhesively cemented. After being air-dried, the intaglio surfaces are silanated and heat dried at 68 oC for 5 minutes (Calset; AdDent Inc). The tooth preparations are airborne-particle abraded and etched for 30 seconds with 37.5% phosphoric acid, rinsed, and dried. Adhesive resin (Optibond FL, bottle 2; Kerr Corp) is applied to both fitting surfaces of the restoration. After the luting material (Filtek Z100; 3M ESPE), preheated to 68oC (in Calset; AdDent), is applied to the tooth, the restorations were individually seated, followed by the elimination of excess composite resin and initial light polymerization. Each surface is exposed at 1000 mW/cm2 for 1 minute (20 seconds per surface, repeated 3 times). Margins are then covered with an air barrier and light polymerized for an additional 20 seconds. Margins are finished and polished at the following appointment with diamond ceramic polishers and silicon impregnated rubber polishers.

Patients are called for a base line evaluation followed by additional evaluations after 1 year, 2 years and 4 years.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Both patient and the evaluators that will asses the performance of the restorations are unaware about the type of material used to fabricate the occlusal veneers

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
14 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients presenting advanced erosive lesions ( cumulative score in all sextants greater than or equal 14, according to classification of BARLETT; GANSS; LUSSI, 2008).
  • •Absence of pain from the tooth to be restored (excluding expected sensitivity due to dentin exposure due to severe erosion).
  • •Application of rubber dam possible
  • •High level of oral hygiene.
  • •Absence of any active periodontal and pulpal disease.
  • •Willingness to wear a nightguard to protect the restorations in case of associated bruxism.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •patients with low level of oral hygiene after all the attempts to improve it failed.

Arms & Interventions

Ceramic restorations

Active Comparator

Ceramic ultrathin occlusal veneers

Intervention: Ceramic ultrathin occlusal veneers (Procedure)

Composite resin restorations

Active Comparator

Composite resin ultrathin occlusal veneers

Intervention: Composite resin ultrathin occlusal veneers (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Survival of ultrathin occlusal veneers (ceramic and composite resin) for the restorative treatment of severe dental erosion.

Time Frame: 1Year

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Luis Henrique Schlichting

Assistant Professor

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Similar Trials