Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04618016
NCT04618016Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Multinational, Long-term Study for the Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome, Oxidation Profile and Wear Analysis of Medium Cross-linked Polyethylene With and Without Vitamin E for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Aesculap AG8 sites in 2 countries605 target enrollmentStarted: March 8, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
605
Locations
8
Primary Endpoint
Clinical Outcome measured with the KSS [performance]

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Prospective, randomized, single-blind, multinational, long-term study for the evaluation of the clinical outcome, oxidation profile and wear analysis of medium cross-linked Polyethylene with and without Vitamin E for total knee arthroplasty

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Indication for a total knee replacement with a mobile-bearing UC or PS inlay
  • Written informed consent for participating at the clinical study
  • Willingness and mental ability to participate at the long-term follow-up examinations

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient age < 18 and > 80 years
  • Pregnancy
  • High risk patients (ASA class >3)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical Outcome measured with the KSS [performance]

Time Frame: 10 years postoperatively

The KSS is an examiner-administrated standard clinical evaluation tool reporting results for patients undergoing TKA. It separates findings in the operated knee (kKSS) score from findings related to the patient's function (fKSS), which might be affected by co-morbidities. The two sub-scores are reported separately ranging from 0 points (worst result) to 100 points (best results), as well as summarized score, total KSS. Final grading of total KSS results Scores of 160 to 200 will be rated as excellent, 140 to 159 as good, 120 to 139 as fair, and less than 120 as poor.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Progress of Clinical Outcome [Oxford Score] compared to baseline(Preoperatively, 3 months, 12 months, 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, 10 years)
  • Survival rate(until the last follow-up at 10 years postoperatively)
  • Quality of Life [EQ-5D-5L](Preoperatively, 3 months, 12 months, 5 years, 10 years)
  • Comparison of Radiographic evaluation over time(baseline (assessed at discharge from hospital up to 10 days postoperatively); 3 months; 12 months; 5 years; 10 years)
  • Comparison of Radiographic alignment over time(baseline (assessed at discharge from hospital up to 10 days postoperatively); 3 months; 12 months; 5 years; 10 years)
  • Oxidation profile and wear analysis of available retrievals(During the course of the study up to 10 years postoperatively)
  • Further analysis of patients having a revision of the primary implant(During the course of the study up to 10 years postoperatively)
  • (Serious) Adverse Events(During the course of the study up to 10 years postoperatively)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (8)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials