Leave Nothing Behind Study Which Compares DCB With Bail Out BRS Versus BRS Strategy Alone
- Conditions
- Drug Coated BalloonBioresorbable ScaffoldPercutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
- Registration Number
- NCT07038408
- Lead Sponsor
- Ceric Sàrl
- Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to investigate the equivalence in early and long-term efficacy between the two "Leave nothing behind strategies" (Drug-Coated Baloon \[DCB\] strategy with bail-out BioResorbable Scaffold \[BRS\] versus BRS strategy) of de-novo native coronary artery lesions in a relatively young Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) population, to be more specific, Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) (Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction \[NSTEMI\] and Unstable angina) between 18-68 years of age scheduled for PCI. The main questions aim to answer are:
DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has noninferior angiographic in-segment net gain at 13 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 60 months compared to BRS strategy?
Participants will be followed at:
1. st FU visit - 1 month (in hospital)
2. nd FU visit - 6 months (telephone)
3. rd FU visit - 365 days±15 days (telephone) - 1Y Primary efficacy endpoint
4. th FU visit - 395 days±15 days (in hospital) co-primary efficacy endpoint for the angiographic substudy
5. th FU visit - 730 days±30 days (telephone call) - 2Y
6. th FU visit - 1095 days±30 days (telephone call) - 3Y
7. th FU visit - 1460 days±30 days (telephone call) - 4Y
8. th FU visit- 1825 days±30 days (telephone call) - 5Y
- Detailed Description
The Leave Nothing Behind Study is an is an investigator-initiated trial. The Primary efficacy endpoint is target-vessel failure (TVF), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Co-primary efficacy endpoint (angiographic substudy) is the in-segment net gain at 13 months.
Investigators aim to enroll 2256 patients in the main study and 196 patients in the angiographic substudy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2256
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years ≤ 68 years
- Single vessel or multivessel disease with low to moderate complex de-novo native coronary artery lesions up to 30 mm length and reference vessel diameter 2.75-4.0 mm
- Maximum of 3 target lesions
- Maximal cumulative lesion length of all treated lesions 80 mm
- Signed informed consent for participation in the study
- ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) treatment at index or in the previous 48 hours
- Severe calcified lesions
- Bifurcations lesions with planned 2 device strategy
- Left-Main (LM) disease ≥ 50% diameter stenosis
- More than 3 target lesions
- Renal insufficiency with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 45 ml/min
- Life expectancy less than 1 year
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin or P2Y12 receptor inhibitors
- Incapable of providing written informed consent
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Under judicial protection, tutorship, or curatorship
- Participation in another trial
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Target-vessel Failure (TVF) From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months Target vessel failiure is defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Target-Vessel Failure (TVF) at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. From enrollment to the end of treatment at every year from 2 years until 5 years follow-up Target vessel failiure is defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization
Target-Lesion Failure (TLF) From enrollment to the end of treatment every year until end of 5 years Target Lesion Failure is is defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization
(Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleedings From enrollment to the end of treatment every year until end of 5 years BARC definitions Type 2: any overt, actionable sign of hemorrhage that does not fit the criteria for type 3, type 4, or type 5 but does meet at least one of the following criteria: requiring nonsurgical, medical intervention by a health care professional; leading to hospitalization or increased level of care; or prompting evaluation.
Type 3a: overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop of 3 to 5 g/dL\* ; any transfusion with overt bleeding.
Type 3b: overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop of 5 g/dL ; cardiac tamponade; bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control ; bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agens.
Type 3c: intracranial hemorrhageNet Adverse Clinical Event (NACE) From enrollment to the end of treatment every year until end of 5 years NACE defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, all-stroke, ischemia driven TVR or BARC 3 or 5 bleeding
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.