Comparison of effect of lignocaine and fentanyl versus dilitazem and fentanyl on hemodynamic response during intubation.
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/01/011483
- Lead Sponsor
- I
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Closed to Recruitment of Participants
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1 .ASA physical status I or II male and female adults.
2. Age group of 18-60 years scheduled for various elective surgical procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
Patient who are not willing to undergo in the study.
b) Patients with known allergy to anaesthetic or any other drug. Error of <0.05
c) Patients with atrio-ventricular conduction block, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrythmia, hypertension or other cardiovascular disease and receiving anti hypertensive drugs and phosphodiestrase inhibitors.
d) Anticipated difficulty in intubation.
e) Severe obesity (BMI >35kg/m²).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare between intravenous lignocaine 1.5mg/kg plus fentanyl 2mcg/kg versus injection diltiazem 0.2mg/kg plus fentanyl 2mcg/kg on hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and intubationTimepoint: 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ditiazem plus fentanyl is better than lignocaine and fentanyl in attenuating hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and intubation.Timepoint: 3 min <br/ ><br>