MedPath

Is the NPWTi Better Than the Conventional NPWT

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Postoperative Wound Infection Deep Incisional Surgical Site
Postoperative Wound Infection Superficial Incisional
Interventions
Device: NPWTi
Device: Conventional NPWT
Registration Number
NCT06014788
Lead Sponsor
Military Medical Academy, Bulgaria
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of NPWTi and NPWT in superficial and deep surgical site infections using an improvised system with continuous lavage with saline and chlorhexidine. The main question it aims to answer is whether the NPWTi is better than conventional NPWT. Participants will be given NPWTi or conventional NPWT.

Researchers will compare the two groups to see if NPWTi diminishes the rate of recurrent infections and the number of reoperations, shortens the hospital stay, and alleviates the burden on the hospital staff in comparison to the conventional NPWT.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • adults over 18 years
  • superficial or deep SSIs after laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • persons < 18 years
  • documented inherited or acquired coagulation disorders or platelet deficiency
  • presence of deep space infection (intra-abdominal abscess or ongoing peritonitis)
  • prosthetic material infection

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NPWTiNPWTiThe whole wound was filled with black foam (Granufoam®, KCI). The instillation was performed via gravity from i.v. bag through a drain put within the foam. Chlorhexidine 0.1% 300 ml in 700 ml saline was used for continuous instillation three times daily (3 L per day) on the background of continuous pressure of 125 mmHg. The dressing changes were performed every 48-72 hours.
conventional NPWTConventional NPWTThe wound was filled with black foam (Granufoam®, KCI) and covered with plastic folio. A continuous pressure of 125 mmHg was applied using the hospital suction system. The dressing changes were performed every 48 hours.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
30-day recurrence rate30 days after discharge

30-day recurrence rate of the infection

eradication of the infection6 weeks

(negative microbiology or bacterial count \< 103)

the rate of wound closure6 weeks

the wound closure by suture or flap

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
time to wound closure6 weeks

the time elapsed from the start of the treatment to wound closure

hospital stay6 weeks

hospital stay in days

number of OR visits6 weeks

number of OR visits and dressing changes under general anesthesia

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Sugery

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath