Patient Research Cohort: Rapidly Evolving Multiple Sclerosis

Completed

Conditions: Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Registration Number: NCT01044576

Lead Sponsor: Imperial College London

Brief Summary: The primary goal of the research cohort is to facilitate patient access to clinical trials testing new therapeutic interventions, or access to second- line treatments.

Secondary objectives of the research cohort study are to obtain detailed clinical phenotyping and immunological analysis of blood samples, aiming to identify and validate biomarkers of disease activity and response to treatment and prognostic markers.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 200

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Contraindication to MRI including but not limited to intracranial aneurism clips (except Sugita), history of intra-orbital metal fragments that have not been removed by an MD (as confirmed by orbital X-Ray), pacemaker and non-MR compatible heart valves, inner ear implants, history of claustrophobia or subject feels unable to lie still on their back for a period of 1.5 hours in the MRI scanner.
If female, positive urine pregnancy test
History or presence of renal impairment (e.g. serum creatinine clearance less than 30ml/min)
Inability to give informed consent/comply with study procedures

Study & Design

Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Proportion of Research Cohort Subjects Referred Into a Clinical Trial or Offered Treatment With an Appropriate Second-line Therapy.	Two years	The primary goal of the observational research cohort is to facilitate patient access to clinical trials testing new therapeutic interventions or appropriate management for rapidly evolving multiple sclerosis (MS). This was devised as a single, combined primary outcome measure. The primary outcome is the proportion of research cohort subjects either referred into a clinical trial or offered treatment with an appropriate second-line therapy. (approved Protocol Version 4.1 - September 13th, 2011). The statistical assumption based on data from similar research cohorts stipulated that 50% of recruited patients will consent to proceed to further clinical trials or access new therapies.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Development of Biomarkers	two years	The outcome consists of the Number of participants whose data was used in biomarkers development studies. Biomarkers studies include analysis of blood immunological studies performed on the study participants' dataset and analysis of correlation of clinical phenotype with immunological data, examples given below. Conditions for participants to meet this outcome measure are: (A) completion of study visits (B) maintained (non-revoked) consent and (C) utilisation of the anonymised immunological and clinical data in any biomarkers study. Given the exploratory nature, no quantitative assumptions are made on the outcome. Examples of studies of biomarkers: 1) Functional relevance of haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation following therapeutic alpha 4-integrin blockade in multiple sclerosis (Dr MMattoscio, ICL). 2)The relationship between T cell responses and disease progression in demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system (Prof D Altmann, ICL).
Development of Clinical Prognostic Markers.	two years	The outcome consists of the Number of participants whose data was used in studies aimed at the development of markers of clinical prognosis. Those are studies involving statistical analysis and models that may enable prognostic predictions from clinical phenotype, imaging and immunological data in any combination, with examples indicated below. Conditions for participants to meet this outcome measure are: (A) completion of study visits (B) maintained (non-revoked) consent and (C) utilisation of the anonymised imaging immunological and clinical data in any prognostic development research. Given their exploratory nature, no specific quantitative assumptions are made on the secondary outcome. Example of studies of prognostic markers: 1) Worse Physical Disability is associated with High Blood frequency of CD8+CD57+(ILT2+PD-1+) T-cells in MS Patients with Older Appearing Brains (Dr S Jacobs, Prof R Nicholas and Prof J Cole, Imperial College London and KCL).
Access and Utilization of Cohort Data	two years	The outcome reports the Number of participants whose data was used in any approved research. Examples of utilisation of data include imaging data analysis for MS-related research performed on the study participants' dataset and analysis of correlation of clinical phenotype with imaging data. Given the exploratory nature, no specific quantitative assumptions are made on the secondary outcome. Examples of studies utilising the anonymised cohort data: (1) Rapidly evolving multiple sclerosis: MRI findings predict clinical progression and disease phenotype (Dr Jean Lee, Dr A Waldmann, Dr R Newbould, ICL). (2) A study to characterize the novel TSPO PET radioligand \[18F\]PBR111 as an in vivo marker of microglial activation in Multiple Sclerosis (Dr A Colasanti, Imanova Ltd and GlaxoSmithKline). Conditions for participants to meet this outcome measure are: (A) completion of study visits (B) maintained (non-revoked) consent and (C) utilisation of the anonymised data in any further study.