FARAPULSE Workflow Assessment Registry
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
- Registration Number
- NCT06656884
- Lead Sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Brief Summary
The study is designed to determine the best practices in the patient pathway, and to analyze pre-procedural, procedural and follow-up workflow data related with ablation of atrial fibrillation where the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation System is used in a commercial and standard of care setting. Workflow-related variables, inclusive of pre-procedural imaging, methods of transseptal access, anesthesia/sedation technique, intracardiac mapping, ablation settings, dosing strategy, lesion sets and general procedure management, will be used to identify predominant workflow schemes that will be associated with patient demographics, procedure-related complications (safety parameters), and one-year effectiveness parameters.
The study data can be used for procedural workflow optimization when using Pulsed Field Ablation for the ablation treatment of Atrial Fibrillation based on patient demographics, cardiac anatomy and arrhythmia characteristics.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 500
- Subjects are prospectively planned and intended to be treated with the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation system for cardiac tissue ablation, per physician's medical judgement, and as per hospitals' standard of care
- Subjects who are willing and capable of providing informed consent
- Subjects who are willing and capable of participating to this Registry at an approved clinical investigational center
- Subjects whose age is 18 years or above, or who are of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law
- Subjects who are currently enrolled in another investigational study or registry that would directly interfere with the current study. Exceptions are when the subject is participating in a mandatory governmental registry, or a purely observational registry, that do not interfere with the current study
- Prior Left Atrium Ablation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Association of patient demographics with Index procedure Workflow-related variables Index Procedure Patient demographics such as age (years), gender, BMI (kg/m²), different comorbidities, LA Volume (ml), PV anatomy, AF type, pre-procedural AF management) will be compared with different index procedure workflow related variables such as pre-procedural imaging, method and location of transseptal access, intracardiac electro-anatomical mapping, imaging techniques, anesthesia/sedation technique, ablation settings, dosing strategy, lesion sets and general procedure management
Association of safety parameters with Index procedure Workflow-related variables 12 months Safety parameters such as device or procedure related serious adverse events (within 7 days onset date) Death; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; TIA; Peripheral or Organ Thromboembolism; Pulmonary Edema; Unresolved Phrenic Nerve Palsy/Paresis at 12 Months post-Index Procedure; Vascular Access Complications; Heart Block; Gastric Motility / Pyloric Spasm Disorders, Cardiac Tamponade / Perforation; Pericarditis; Severe Hemolysis with Subsequent Renal Injury or Significant Anemia / Within 12 Months onset date: Pulmonary Vein Stenosis; Atrio-Esophageal Fistula) will be compared with different index procedure workflow related variables such as pre-procedural imaging, method and location of transseptal access, intracardiac electro-anatomical mapping, imaging techniques, anesthesia/sedation technique, ablation settings, dosing strategy, lesion sets and general procedure management
Association of effectiveness parameters with Index procedure Workflow-related variables 12 months Acute and long-term (freedom from AF episodes and freedom from intervention for AF/AFL/AT) Effectiveness parameters will be compared with different index procedure workflow related variables such as pre-procedural imaging, method and location of transseptal access, intracardiac electro-anatomical mapping, imaging techniques, anesthesia/sedation technique, ablation settings, dosing strategy, lesion sets and general procedure management
Association of patient demographics with effectiveness parameters 12 months Patient demographics such as age (years), gender, BMI (kg/m²), different comorbidities, LA Volume (ml), PV anatomy, AF type, pre-procedural AF management) will be compared with Acute and long-term (freedom from AF episodes and freedom from intervention for AF/AFL/AT) Effectiveness parameters
Association of patient demographics with safety parameters 12 months Patient demographics such as age (years), gender, BMI (kg/m²), different comorbidities, LA Volume (ml), PV anatomy, AF type, pre-procedural AF management) will be compared with Safety parameters such as device or procedure related serious adverse events (within 7 days onset date) Death; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; TIA; Peripheral or Organ Thromboembolism; Pulmonary Edema; Unresolved Phrenic Nerve Palsy/Paresis at 12 Months post-Index Procedure; Vascular Access Complications; Heart Block; Gastric Motility / Pyloric Spasm Disorders, Cardiac Tamponade / Perforation; Pericarditis; Severe Hemolysis with Subsequent Renal Injury or Significant Anemia / Within 12 Months onset date: Pulmonary Vein Stenosis; Atrio-Esophageal Fistula)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (33)
Munchen Klinik Bogenhausen
🇩🇪München, Germany
A.o. Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz
🇦🇹Linz, Austria
Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom, Middelheim
🇧🇪Antwerp, Belgium
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
🇧🇪Genk, Belgium
CHR de la Citadelle
🇧🇪Namur, Belgium
CHU de Bordeaux
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
Hopital Saint Philibert
🇫🇷Lomme, France
CHRU Hopital Trousseau
🇫🇷Tours, France
Universitaetsklinikum Dusseldorf
🇩🇪Düsseldorf, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Germany
Scroll for more (23 remaining)Munchen Klinik Bogenhausen🇩🇪München, GermanyEllen Hoffmann, MDContact