跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01639443
NCT01639443已完成不适用

Reducing VA No-Shows: Evaluation of Predictive Overbooking Applied to Colonoscopy

VA Office of Research and Development1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2013年7月8日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
180
试验地点
1
主要终点
Percentage of GI Clinic Capacity Filled

研究概览

简要总结

In this research study, investigators use colonoscopy as a case example to evaluate a predictive overbooking model derived using patient-level predictors of absenteeism. The no-show overbooking intervention employs a logistic regression model that uses patient data to predict the odds of no-showing with 80% accuracy. These projected no-show appointments will be overbooked by clerks for patients who agree to join a "fast track" short-call line. By rapidly processing endoscopy patients and moving them out of traditional slots, investigators predict more scheduling slots would become available for patients awaiting colonoscopy.

详细描述

Patient "no-shows" are especially common in VA gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy units, where both open-access endoscopy scheduling and patient dislike of procedures contribute to high absenteeism. In this proposal, investigators use endoscopy as a case example to evaluate a predictive overbooking model derived using patient-level predictors of absenteeism. The no-show overbooking intervention employs a logistic regression model that uses patient data to predict the odds of no-showing with 80% accuracy. These projected no-show appointments will be overbooked by clerks for patients who agree to join a "fast track" short-call line. However, patients scheduled for upper endoscopies in the "fast track" assume a small risk of service denial on the day of their overbooking in case of inaccurate predictions. If this occurs, the patient is guaranteed service in the next available position and is assured of having a shorter wait time. Patients scheduled for colonoscopies will never be turned down but may experience delays in the waiting room the day of their "fast track" appointment. By rapidly processing endoscopy patients and moving them out of traditional slots, investigators predict more scheduling slots would become available for patients awaiting colonoscopy. Investigators propose to conduct a prospective, 24-month, interrupted time series (ITS) trial in the WLAVA (West Los Angeles Veterans Administration) GI clinic endoscopy unit. During intervention periods, investigators will activate the no-show predictive overbooking strategy described above. Investigators will compare outcomes between scheduling strategies, including differences in percent utilization of capacity (primary outcome), number of Veterans served, mean patient lag time between scheduling and procedure, number of unexpected service denials ("bumps") from no-show predictive overbooking, and direct costs of care. Investigators will analyze differences using both traditional univariate and multivariate approaches, and using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) analyses to adjust for auto-correlations in ITS data.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Patients who are scheduled for upper endoscopy and agree to the terms of "fast track" offer.

排除标准

  • •If a patient expresses concern about service denial, confusion about the bargain, or refuses to participate, the investigators will schedule these patients routinely.

研究组 & 干预措施

Control

No Intervention

Patients who are scheduled routinely

Fast-tracked

Experimental

'Predictive no-show overbooking' intervention. Patients who volunteer to enroll in "fast-track" line, which gives them an opportunity to overbook their appointment for endoscopy earlier in a predictive no-show slots.

干预措施: Predictive no-show overbooking (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of GI Clinic Capacity Filled

时间窗: After 12 months of running study in clinic

Investigators' primary objective will be to evaluate the impact of no-show predictive overbooking on percentage of the GI endoscopy clinic that are filled on a given day. Days where at least one Fast-tracked patient attended an appointment were compared to days where only Control patients attended appointments. Percentage of GI Clinic Capacity is calculated as the number of appointments completed divided by number of appointment spots available on a given day. This percentage was compared between Fast-tracked days and Control days, using data from 1672 patients.

次要结局

  • Length of Workday(After 12 months of running study in clinic)
  • Advanced Adenoma Detection/Cecal Intubation Rates(After 20 months of running study in clinic)
  • Scheduling-to-procedure Lag Time(After 12 months of running study in clinic)
  • Daily Service Denials ("Bumps")(After 12 months of running study in clinic)
  • Cost Comparisons(After 12 months of running study in clinic)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验