A prospective study to compare effects of laparoscopic surgery on haemodynamic and respiratory parameters using two different techniques of airway management in childre
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- ASA GRADE I
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/02/011697
- Lead Sponsor
- Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safderjung Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
All patients in study were of American Society Of Anesthesiology (ASA) Grade I in the age group of 1-10 years of either sex posted for video-endoscopic surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with known cardiovascular, respiratory or neurological diseases.
2. Patients having upper respiratory tract infection.
3. Patients with coagulation disorders.
4. Patients subsequently converted to open surgical procedure in intraoperative period.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Both Proseal LMA and Endotracheal tube can be safely used, proseal being better choice.Timepoint: 5 min before insertion of an airway device : t0 <br/ ><br>5 min after insertion of an airway device : t1 <br/ ><br>5 min before insufflation of CO2 : t2 <br/ ><br>15 min after insufflation of CO2 : t3 <br/ ><br>30 min after insufflation of CO2 : t4 <br/ ><br>5 min after desufflation of CO2 : t5 <br/ ><br>5 min after removal of airway device : t6.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Multi-centric studies with much larger sample of subjects and ethnicity are needed for validation of the concluded results.Timepoint: NI