跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00012714
NCT00012714已完成2 期

Evaluation of Subacute Rehabilitative Care

US Department of Veterans Affairs2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2001年3月16日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
180
试验地点
2

研究概览

简要总结

Prior rehabilitation outcome studies had many weaknesses. They had: a) evaluated rehabilitation effects only in isolated subgroups, b) focused on functional ability rather than on quality of life, c) not used randomized control groups, and d) had inadequate sample sizes. Differences in methodological approaches have resulted in inconsistent findings. The lack of long-term benefits suggests that services may need to be continued at home or in subacute care settings to optimize their effectiveness. Unfortunately, prior research did not include behavioral outcomes. The potential benefits of rehabilitative care could thus not be evaluated by these studies in more meaningful detail, and they did not accurately reflect the psychosocial objectives of rehabilitation.

详细描述

Background:

Prior rehabilitation outcome studies had many weaknesses. They had: a) evaluated rehabilitation effects only in isolated subgroups, b) focused on functional ability rather than on quality of life, c) not used randomized control groups, and d) had inadequate sample sizes. Differences in methodological approaches have resulted in inconsistent findings. The lack of long-term benefits suggests that services may need to be continued at home or in subacute care settings to optimize their effectiveness. Unfortunately, prior research did not include behavioral outcomes. The potential benefits of rehabilitative care could thus not be evaluated by these studies in more meaningful detail, and they did not accurately reflect the psychosocial objectives of rehabilitation.

Objectives:

The goal of this study was to measure the additive effect of outpatient, subacute rehabilitation as follow-up services to acute, inpatient rehabilitation on adults diagnosed with a disabling disorder in four major diagnostic groups (nervous, circulatory, musculoskeletal, and injury).

Methods:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
55 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Presence of physical limitation and need for rehabilitative care as indicated by a score >1 (not independent) on the Nursing Ward Classification index; availability of a family member selected by the patient; Major Diagnostic Code (MDC) 1, 5, 8, or 21 (comprising 87% of cases)

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验