跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2015/05/005748
CTRI/2015/05/005748已完成不适用

Comparative evaluation of three suturing techniques on periodontal health of distal surface of 2nd molar after mandibular 3rd molar surgery

MM College of Dental Sciences and Research1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2010年2月11日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
1.Probing pocket depth (PPD)

研究概览

简要总结

Background- Third molarsare the most common impacted teeth. Therefore, removal of third molar is themost common minor surgical procedure in the oral cavity. Periodontal pocketdistal to mandibular second molar is one of the important complications aftermandibular third molar removal.

Methods-This randomizedcontrolled clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy of threedifferent suturing techniques of Interrupted, anchor, and close anchor suture.Thirty patients having bilateral impacted mandibular third molar participatedin this study.  All patients were dividedinto three groups. In Group 1, surgical wound distal to 2ndmandibular molar was closed by interrupted suture technique on one side &anchor suture technique on the opposite side. In Group 2, surgical wound wasclosed by interrupted suture technique on one side & close anchor suturetechnique on the opposite side. In Group 3, surgical wound was closed by anchorsuture technique on one side & close anchor suture technique on theopposite side.

Results – comparison ofthe pre and post operative plaque index in three suturing technique has shownlowest plaque index score in anchor suture area (p<0.05). Bleeding index hasshown statistically significant decreased post operative score in anchor suturegroup. Post operative pocket depth was lowest in interrupted suture area ascompare to anchor and closed anchor suture area. Comparison of the pre and postoperative clinical attachment level has minimally changed in anchor suture ascompare to interrupted and closed anchor suture technique.

Conclusion- In our study,anchor suture seems to be slightly better as compare to interrupted and closedanchor suture technique.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Random Number Table
盲法
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
16.00 Year(s) 至 30.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Patients between the age of 16 to 30 year.
  • 2.Patients with good general health (ASA Class I & II) and without any contraindication for oral surgery &/ or local anaesthesia.
  • 3.Having bilateral impacted mandibular 3rd molar.
  • 4.Periodontally healthy patients.

排除标准

  • 1.Patient with systemic condition that according to the investigator would preclude surgery.
  • 2.Patient with acute infectious lesion in areas intended for surgery 3.Participation of the patient in other clinical trials 4.Patient who is not willing to participate 5.Alcohol or drug abuse or any condition associated with poor compliance 6.Pregnant or lactating mother.

结局指标

主要结局

1.Probing pocket depth (PPD)

时间窗: from April 2011 to March 2013

. The following local periodontal parameters of the mandibular 2nd molar were recorded at the distobuccal, middistal, and distolingual surface

时间窗: from April 2011 to March 2013

2.Clinical attachment level (CAL)

时间窗: from April 2011 to March 2013

3.Bleeding Index (BI)

时间窗: from April 2011 to March 2013

4.Plaque Index(PI)

时间窗: from April 2011 to March 2013

次要结局

  • . The following local periodontal parameters of the mandibular 2nd molar were recorded at the distobuccal, middistal, and distolingual surface(1.Probing pocket depth (PPD))

研究者

发起方
MM College of Dental Sciences and Research
申办方类型
Other [private dental college]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Effect of three suturing techniques on distal... | 临床试验