Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Treatment Combined With Alveolar Bone Regeneration

Phase 4

Completed

• Conditions: Patients Requiring Mandible Orthodontic Treatment

• Registration Number: NCT03655938
• Lead Sponsor: University of Liege

Brief Summary

This study was designed to enroll a series of 10 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were treated in the Department of Orthodontics and Dento-Facial Orthodopedics of the University of Liège. Two senior's orthodontists and two senior's periodontists were involved in the orthodontic treatment and in the surgical procedures respectively. All clinical, radiographic and periodontal measurements and all orthodontic parameters were performed at baseline and after the orthodontic treatments. Tree examiners collected the overall data.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2017-03-20
• Primary Completion: 2018-03-20
• Study Completion: 2018-03-20
• Study First Submitted: 2018-06-11
• Status Verified: 2018-08
• Study First Submitted QC: 2018-08-30
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-08-30
• Study First Posted: 2018-08-31
• Last Update Posted: 2018-08-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Radiographic change from Baseline and after 1year	Baseline and after 1year	The patients underwent baseline and post treatment CBCT scans (Somaton® Emotion; Siemens, Munich, Germany). Measurements of the alveolar bone changes in the lower front region on pre- and post- treatment CT volumes were done by reformatting the orthogonal slices, along the sagittal, coronal and axial length axes of each individual tooth. A strict vestibular bone level measurement (sagittal slice) and three alveolar bone width measurements at crestal level, 3mm from the crest and 6mm from the crest (axial slices) were performed per individual tooth. In addition, CT images were analyzed in using a dedicated platform in an image processing software (MeVisLab, MeVis Medical Solutions AG, Bremen,Germany) where pre- and post-treatment volumes were superposed using rigid image registration. Semi-automatically segmentation using region growing with same seed-point and threshold value for both scans, was followed with a hole-filling algorithm to obtain segmented volumes of the cropped image in

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Periodontal Evaluation	Baseline and after 1 year	The following clinical parameters were measured at baseline and after the orthodontic treatments: recession depths (RDs), pocket depth, plaque index (PI) and papilla bleeding index (PBI). A recession score was calculated by summing the recession depths. Next, the presence of gingival scars due to the overall treatment of each patient was categorized as an absence of scars, point-shape scars or linear-shape scars. Full periodontal charting (probing in four sites per tooth) was performed in all patients before and after the treatment; the results were expressed as score per sextant.
Patient assessment	Baseline and after 1year	The patient-centered outcomes were recorded using a Visual Analog Scale questionnaire that employed a 0-10 graduated scale. The following parameters were collected: apprehension before treatment (scale ranges, minimum=0 and maximum=10) scores), pain level after treatment and daily analgesic consumption following orthodontic appliance placement and piezocision (scale ranges, minimum=0 and maximum=10). After the overall treatment, the levels of satisfaction in terms of the final result (scale ranges, minimum=0 and maximum=10), the treatment duration and whether the patient would recommend the procedure to a friend were assessed (scale ranges, Yes=0 and No=10). Finally, the patients were asked whether they would undergo the treatment again (scale ranges, Yes=0 and No=10).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU University of Liège; 🇧🇪 Liège, Belgium