Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Botulinum Toxin Injection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Only in Patients With Atrial Flutter
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Atrial Flutter
- Interventions
- Procedure: radiofrequency ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT02002962
- Lead Sponsor
- Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
- Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized study was to assess the effectiveness of endomyocardial botulinum toxin injection for preventing post-procedural atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing the radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECG documented paroxysmal or persistent AFL
- No prior documented history of AF
- Patient undergoing RFA of AFL.
- No indication (other than AFL) for continued anticoagulation with warfarin.
- No existing implantable cardiac device (pacemaker, defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device)
Exclusion Criteria
- A history of atrial fibrillation
- Previous AF ablation procedure
- Congestive heart failure
- Left Ventricle ejection fraction less than 35%
- Unwillingness to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description RFA+BT injection Botulinum Toxin Type A injection Transseptal puncture is performed by used standard endovascular approach. Injection of the botulinum toxin is performed in main anatomical zones of ganglionated plexuses of left atrium using Myostar catheter (Biosense Webster). RFA+BT injection radiofrequency ablation Transseptal puncture is performed by used standard endovascular approach. Injection of the botulinum toxin is performed in main anatomical zones of ganglionated plexuses of left atrium using Myostar catheter (Biosense Webster). RFA radiofrequency ablation Externally-irrigated tip (5-mm tip, Celsius Thermo-Cool, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Temperature-controlled RF delivery was performed with a maximum power output of 50 W and temperature limit of 50 C. The catheter was irrigated using 0.9% saline infusion at a flow rate of 20-40 mL/min during RF delivery and 2 mL/min between applications using a commercially available pump (Cool Flow, Biosense Webster).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method serious adverse events 1 year AF burden 1 year
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
🇷🇺Novosibirsk, Russian Federation