MedPath

Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Botulinum Toxin Injection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Only in Patients With Atrial Flutter

Phase 2
Conditions
Atrial Flutter
Interventions
Procedure: radiofrequency ablation
Registration Number
NCT02002962
Lead Sponsor
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Brief Summary

The aim of this randomized study was to assess the effectiveness of endomyocardial botulinum toxin injection for preventing post-procedural atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing the radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ECG documented paroxysmal or persistent AFL
  • No prior documented history of AF
  • Patient undergoing RFA of AFL.
  • No indication (other than AFL) for continued anticoagulation with warfarin.
  • No existing implantable cardiac device (pacemaker, defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device)
Exclusion Criteria
  • A history of atrial fibrillation
  • Previous AF ablation procedure
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Left Ventricle ejection fraction less than 35%
  • Unwillingness to participate

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
RFA+BT injectionBotulinum Toxin Type A injectionTransseptal puncture is performed by used standard endovascular approach. Injection of the botulinum toxin is performed in main anatomical zones of ganglionated plexuses of left atrium using Myostar catheter (Biosense Webster).
RFA+BT injectionradiofrequency ablationTransseptal puncture is performed by used standard endovascular approach. Injection of the botulinum toxin is performed in main anatomical zones of ganglionated plexuses of left atrium using Myostar catheter (Biosense Webster).
RFAradiofrequency ablationExternally-irrigated tip (5-mm tip, Celsius Thermo-Cool, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Temperature-controlled RF delivery was performed with a maximum power output of 50 W and temperature limit of 50 C. The catheter was irrigated using 0.9% saline infusion at a flow rate of 20-40 mL/min during RF delivery and 2 mL/min between applications using a commercially available pump (Cool Flow, Biosense Webster).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
number of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation1 year
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
serious adverse events1 year
AF burden1 year

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology

🇷🇺

Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath