MedPath

Efficacy of TECAR Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Energy Transfer Capacitative and Resistive Therapy
Interventions
Device: conventional physical therapy; Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, hotpack
Device: TECAR
Registration Number
NCT06418360
Lead Sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Brief Summary

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the treatment efficacy of TECAR therapy, a modern application that has been increasingly used in recent years, compared to conventional physical therapy applications in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, according to the evaluation of the clinical findings of patients.

Methods: A total of 54 patients, aged between 40 and 75 years, were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received CPT. Group 2 received TECAR therapy in addition to CPT, applied three times a week for two weeks, for a total of 6 sessions. All patient's knee joint range of motion (ROM) was measured goniometrically, isometric quadriceps muscle strength was measured, and pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and disability levels were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) before treatment, at the end of treatment, at 1 month, and at 3 months.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
54
Inclusion Criteria
  • 3 months of conservative treatment for unresponsive knee pain
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 on radiographic evaluation
  • Agreed to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of physical therapy (electrotherapy/exercise) in the past 3 months
  • Intra-articular injection therapy in the past 3 months,
  • History of surgery or trauma to the affected knee
  • Inflammatory or neurological disease affecting the lower extremities
  • Active vasculitis or severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Diagnosed restless legs syndrome
  • Neoplasia
  • Local sensory impairment,
  • Local or systemic acute infections
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Pacemaker
  • Psychiatric disorder and cognitive impairment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
conventional physical therapy (CPT)conventional physical therapy; Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, hotpackGroup 1 (HP, TENS, knee isometric and theraband exercise) to painful side knee area, two weeks, five times a week, 10 sessions.
conventional physical therapy (CPT) and TECAR therapyTECARGroup 2 (HP, TENS, knee isometric and theraband exercise) 10 sessions, two weeks, five times a week and in addition TECAR therapy, to painful side knee quadriceps and peripatellar area, three times a week for two weeks, for a total of 6 sessions.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Before and the after treatment 0th day , 1th month, 3rd month

0 min , 10 is maximum pain score

Range of Motion (ROM)Before and the after treatment 0th day, 1th month, 3rd month

Flexion and extension of the knee joint were measured using a universal goniometer relative to reference points.

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)Before and the after treatment 0th day, 1th month, 3rd month

This 24-item index comprises three subscales: pain, stiffness, and physical function, each measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "none" to "extreme."

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Diers Myoline Isometric Muscle Strength Measurement SystemBefore and the end of treatment 0th day, 1th month, 3rd month

quadriceps muscle Isometric Strength Measure: Increased isometric muscle strength is an indicator of recovery.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Özge TEZEN

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath