Influence Of Individualized Two Weeks Mild Sleep Restriction On Tactical Performance During Small-Sided Games In National Male Under-19 Football Players: A Randomized Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 16
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The goal was to evaluate the influence that chronic sleep restriction may have on football players tactical performance during small-sided games. By using a relative sleep restriction (i.e., by reducing the normal sleep duration by 15%) instead of an absolute sleep restriction (e.g., 3-4 hours), different sleep schedules were applied, according to the players individual sleep profile. It was hypothesized that the player's performance would be impaired, particularly their tactical behaviors when performing a 4x4 small-sided game format.
Detailed Description
An impairment on cognitive and physical performance is commonly suggested in literature. However, there is a lack of information regarding sport-specific parameters. Thus, the present study aimed to examine whether chronic sleep restriction during 9 consecutive days impairs the tactical performance of football players during small-sided games (SSGs). A total of sixteen national level male football players wore wrist actigraphy units during night sleep throughout the study. Players were randomized into two groups: intervention (IG), and control (CG). The first four days corresponded to a familiarization period, where players were informed about the study procedures and started using wrist actigraphy. Throughout the next seven consecutive days, the characterization phase of sleep players profile (i.e., baseline) was collected and analyzed. Then, players entered the intervention phase, where the IG slept 15% less than routine. During this 9-days period, players performed a 4x4 SSGs in two moments (moment 1 and moment 2) with a week interval. The SSGs were recorded using a video camera and subsequently analyzed using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Basic Science
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- — to 19 Years (Child, Adult)
- Sex
- Male
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Soccer players classified as Tier 3, corresponding to the National Level in accordance to McKay et al. (2022), as they represented the under-19 team playing in the Portuguese National Championship 1st Division.
Exclusion Criteria
- •players with previously identified sleep disorders;
- •players with injuries that prevented them from playing SSGs.
Arms & Interventions
Sleep restriction
During the intervention period (i.e., 9 consecutive days), the intervention group started the sleep protocol, sleeping only the quantity of hours defined for their individual chronic partial sleep restriction (15% of usual daily sleep hours). The amount and quality of sleep obtained were daily monitored through actigraphy devices, and all the players filled in a sleep diary when they woke up. During this period, players performed the SSGs in two different moments (moment 1 and moment 2), interspersed by 4 days.
Intervention: Sleep restriction (Behavioral)
Controls
Same intervention (i.e., soccer training and tests) as the other arm, but with no sleep restriction.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI)
Time Frame: Applied once in week 1 and once again in week 2
According to study purposes, tactical performance was defined as the main variables. Tactical analysis was performed using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI), a tool designed to evaluate the individual tactical behavior (Memmert \& Harvey, 2008; Oslin, Mitchell, \& Griffin, 1998). It consists of seven components, two of which are evaluated when the player has the ball and the remaining five when the player does not have the ball possession. For example, decisions made about what to do with the ball during the game, and motor skill execution were classified as appropriate/efficient or inappropriate/inefficient. The main index proposed by Oslin et al. (1998) was calculated: Game Performance (GP). Based on actions deemed appropriate or inappropriate, the final score can range from 0 to 100%, with higher values denoting better outcomes.
Secondary Outcomes
- Sleep efficiency(Collected daily during the two weeks of the intervention)
Investigators
José Afonso Coelho Neves
Supervisor of the lead author's Master Thesis
Universidade do Porto