Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00328640
NCT00328640CompletedPhase 4

Secondary Prevention After Ischemic Stroke: A Trial of an Evidence-Based System-Wide Intervention

University of California, San Francisco2 sites in 1 country1,500 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2005Last updated:
Conditions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
1,500
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Medication utilization

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Is a secondary prevention intervention, focused on implementation of standardized pre-printed discharge orders for hospitalists, effective at increasing utilization of the following evidence-based treatments 6 months after discharge for ischemic stroke:

  1. Treatment with statins,
  2. Control of hypertension, and
  3. Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Detailed Description

There are several proven strategies for prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke, including use of statins, treatment of hypertension, and anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Preliminary analyses suggest that only 9-15% of Kaiser Permanente Northern California's ischemic stroke patients receive optimal care for secondary prevention of stroke. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not a quality improvement (QI) intervention can improve the care received by stroke patients. This project consists of a randomized trial of standardized stroke discharge order forms to improve adherence with best practices in secondary stroke prevention. The primary research question is: Is a secondary prevention intervention, focused on implementation of standardized pre-printed discharge orders for hospitalists, effective at increasing utilization of the following evidence-based treatments 6 months after discharge for ischemic stroke: (1) treatment with statins, (2) control of hypertension, and (3) anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients receiving optimal treatment, as defined by these three goals. The impact of the intervention will be measures as a change after-to-before at intervention hospitals compared to non-intervention (control) hospitals, with the institution as the unit of analysis. Secondary analyses will evaluate the impact of the intervention on each of these components and on 6-month and 1-year rates of mortality, readmission for stroke, and costs of care after discharge.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Ischemic stroke Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan Member with Pharmacy Benefit Discharged alive to home

Exclusion Criteria

  • tpA patients Hemorrhagic stroke TIA Significant comorbidities

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Medication utilization

Best Practices

Recurrent stroke

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mortality
  • Morbidity
  • Cost
  • Hospital readmission

Investigators

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Quality Improvement in Stroke Prevention... | Clinical Trial