跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07317024
NCT07317024
已完成
不适用

Additional Effects of Shockwave Therapy Along With Median Nerve Gliding Exercises in Patient With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Foundation University Islamabad1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 26 人开始时间: 2024年9月10日最近更新:

概览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
26
试验地点
1
主要终点
Perceived Pain Level

概览

简要总结

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a widespread condition resulting from the compression of the median nerve, causing significant pain, numbness, and weakness in the hand.This study decisively evaluates the impactful effects of integrating shockwave therapy (ESWT) with median nerve gliding exercises.The primary goals are to enhance median nerve function, improve hand performance, and achieve superior pain management.This will be a rigorous non-blinded randomized control trial involving two groups formed through purposive sampling .A total of 12 sessions of shockwave therapy with median nerve gliding exercises and 12 sessions of median nerve gliding exercises were performed in both groups, with three sessions each week over a four-week period. The experimental group were received shockwave therapy and median nerve gliding exercises while the control group were given physical therapy and median nerve gliding exercises.Outcomes will be measured using NCS BTCQ and NPRS. The study will take place over one year at FFH and FUCP, with ethical approval from ERC FUMC.

详细描述

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are:

  1. To evaluate and compare the effects of shockwave therapy combined with nerve gliding exercises against nerve gliding exercises alone on the velocity and amplitude of the median nerve.
  2. To analyze and compare the impact of shockwave therapy combined with nerve gliding exercises versus nerve gliding exercises alone on hand function in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome.
  3. To assess and compare the effects of shockwave therapy combined with nerve gliding exercises with those of nerve gliding exercises alone on reported pain levels.

HYPOTHESIS

Alternate Hypothesis:

There will be statistically significant difference in effects of shockwave therapy combined with nerve gliding exercises and in comparison to nerve gliding exercises alone on hand functional strength, velocity and amplitude of the median nerve and pain. . (p<0.05).

Null Hypothesis:

There will be no statistically significant difference in effects of shockwave therapy combined with nerve gliding exercises and in comparison to nerve gliding exercises alone on hand functional strength, velocity and amplitude of the median nerve and pain. (p<0.05).

Research Design: Experimental study. Randomized Control Trial

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Gender: Both females and males were included.
  • Age: Between 20 and 40 years old.
  • Patients exhibiting positive results on the "Phalen's test and Tinel's test."
  • Presence of symptoms, including pain, tingling and numbness, affecting the first, second and third fingers.

排除标准

  • Individuals with a history of wrist surgery.
  • Patients with active infections or cancer, for whom shockwave therapy is contraindicated.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis.

结局指标

主要结局

Perceived Pain Level

时间窗: 4 weeks

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a patient-reported measure of pain intensity, with lower scores indicating less pain. Scores between 0-1 indicate minimal pain, generally with little to no interference in daily life. Mild pain, characterized by scores of 2-3. A score in the 4-6 range signifies moderate pain, which is noticeable, can interfere with specific daily functions. Finally, severe pain, represented by scores of 7-10, is intense.

Hand Movement and Function

时间窗: 4 weeks

Functional Status Scale (BCFSS) measures the difficulty patients experience with performing specific daily activities affected by CTS, also often on a 1-5 point scale, where higher scores reflect greater functional limitation. Lower scores mean better hand function. Scores around 1.0-2.0 indicate mild impact, 2.0-3.0 moderate impact, and above 3.0 severe impact.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验