Comparison Effects of Lumbosacral Plexus Block and Sacral Plexus Block + Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Plane Block Combination on Perioperative Pain Measured With Analgesia Nociceptive Index Monitor on High-risk Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- effective analgesia control in patients with Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI)
研究概览
简要总结
In this study, our is to compare effect of lumbosacral plexus and sacral plexus + suprainguinal fascia iliaca plane block on perioperative pain via analgesia nociceptive index monitor on high-risk patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
详细描述
The most preferred types of anesthesia in hip surgery are general anesthesia or neuraxial blocks. Both types have advantages as well as disadvantages. They may cause hemodynamic instability in geriatric and comorbid patient groups.
Peripheral nerve blocks have been associated with fewer complications both in the treatment of postoperative pain and in fragile, high-risk patients, making them an alternative to other anesthesia types.
It is important for patients to accurately measure their perioperative analgesic needs. There are many subjective methods for assessing pain. In the evaluation of analgesia level with Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitorization, it is advantageous to evaluate the objective findings measuring parasympathetic system activity.
ANI is a monitor that can be measured continuously and non-invasively. It measures parasympathetic tone - based on electrocardiography - by analyzing minimal changes in heart rate that occur under anesthesia, in the early stages of awakening, and in each respiratory cycle of awake patients. At the end of the measurement, a value between 0-100 is obtained.
Parasympathetic modulation (stress level, e.g., pain) is obtained with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum of 100. ANI values measured in the early period of recovery correlate with pain scores. When compared with hemodynamic parameters, it has been reported that the ANI response is more sensitive to nociceptive stimuli occurring in the intraoperative period.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients over the age of 18 who will undergo hip surgery
- •ASA group 3-4 patients
- •Patients without allergies
- •Patients without psychiatric disorders
- •Patients without opioid dependence
- •Patients without severe liver and kidney failure
- •Patients without arrhythmia and beta-blocker use
- •Patients without contraindications for peripheral blocks
排除标准
- •Patients who do not accept peripheral nerve block
- •Patients with failed peripheral nerve block
- •Patients scheduled for bilateral hip fracture surgery
- •Patients who have been operated on for hip fractures before
- •Patients with arrhythmia and beta-blocker use
- •Patients with contraindications for peripheral blocks
- •Chronic opioid consumption
结局指标
主要结局
effective analgesia control in patients with Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI)
时间窗: postoperative 24 hour
With Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), it is advantageous to evaluate the objective findings measuring parasympathetic system activity. A value between 0-100 is obtained, Values between 50 and 70 indicate good analgesia control. According to studies on ANI, the patient feels pain below 50. If it is above 70, it means that more analgesia is provided. It is thought that pain control will be more effective with these objective data.
Comparison of the Effects of Two Regional Anesthesia Techniques on Pain in High-Risk Hip Fracture Surgery with analgesia nociception index
时间窗: postoperative 24 hour
次要结局
- visual analog scale and ANI consistency comparison(postoperative 24 hour)
研究者
Recep Aksu
Professor Doctor
TC Erciyes University
