ISRCTN10460622
Completed
未知
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness Trial of Humanistic cOunselling in Schools
niversity of Roehampton (UK)0 sites329 target enrollmentMay 16, 2016
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Psychological distress
- Sponsor
- niversity of Roehampton (UK)
- Enrollment
- 329
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
2018 protocol in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523206 2021 results in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33484658/ (added 25/01/2021)
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Inclusion criteria as of 12/07/2016:
- •In order to be eligible to take part in the ETHOS study, the young person must meet all of the following criteria at the point of assessment:
- •1\. Aged between 13 and 16 years of age at the time of assessment
- •2\. Be experiencing moderate to severe levels of psychological distress as assessed by a score of 5 or more on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Emotional Symptoms Scale
- •3\. Able to speak and read English (with a minimum reading age of 13 years)
- •4\. Want to participate in counselling, or want to undertake counselling, or want to see a counsellor
- •5\. Not currently in receipt of counselling or any other therapeutic intervention that may be impeded through participation in the trial
- •6\. Have a school attendance record of at least 85% as assessed by the school
- •Original inclusion criteria:
- •1\. Aged between 13 and 16 years of age at the time of assessment
Exclusion Criteria
- •Exclusion criteria as of 12/07/2016:
- •1\. Considered by the researcher, as unable to provide informed consent (not ‘Gillick competent’)
- •2\. The parent/carer of the young person has not provided their consent for the young person to take part in the study
- •3\. Assessed by the researcher, or a teacher, to be at risk of serious harm to self or others at the time of assessment
- •4\. Planning to leave the school within the academic year
- •5\. Unwilling to complete all assessments
- •6\. Unwilling to allow sessions to be audio recorded for the purposes of auditing
- •Original exclusion criteria:
- •1\. Considered by the researcher, as unable to provide informed consent
- •2\. The parent/carer of the young person has not provided their consent for the young person to take part in the study
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of self-monitoring and treatment of blood pressure in secondary prevention following stroke or transient ischaemic attackTopic: StrokeSubtopic: Primary Care, RehabilitationDisease: Therapy typeCirculatory SystemISRCTN86192648orfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust156
Completed
Not Applicable
Effectiveness of the run-a-mile interventioObesity prevention, physical activityNutritional, Metabolic, EndocrineISRCTN12698269niversity of Birmingham2,280
Completed
Phase 3
Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) to enable person-centred care for people with dementia and their carersTopic: Dementias and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research NetworkSubtopic: DementiaDisease: DementiaMental and Behavioural DisordersUnspecified dementiaISRCTN82288852eeds Beckett University (UK)726
Completed
Not Applicable
How effective is FITNET-NHS for children and young adults with CFS/ME?Paediatric CFS/MENervous System DiseasesPostviral fatigue syndromeISRCTN18020851niversity of Bristol (UK)314
Completed
Not Applicable
niversal warming protocolWarming cryopreserved human oocytesPregnancy and ChildbirthISRCTN12342851GynePro Medical169