Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01397331
NCT01397331
Terminated
Phase 4

Influence of Anesthesia on Mechanical Efficiency of Left Ventricle in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery

Sheba Medical Center1 site in 1 country28 target enrollmentJuly 1, 2010

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Isoflurane
Conditions
Heart; Dysfunction Postoperative, Cardiac Surgery
Sponsor
Sheba Medical Center
Enrollment
28
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Changes of the relationship between left ventricular end-systolic elastance and effective arterial end-systolic elastance.
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to delineate and compare the changes in coupled mechanical properties of left ventricle and arterial vascular bed caused by two popular anesthetic protocols commonly used in cardiac surgery (intravenous, based on the infusion of propofol, versus inhalational, based on isoflurane) on different stages of the surgery.

Detailed Description

Background From mechanical point of view the goal of the cardiovascular system is to distribute the kinetic energy of blood ejection from the left ventricle (LV) to body organs with minimal loss and greatest efficiency. The left ventricle and the arterial circulation work as "coupled" system. The ideal coupling supposes that a maximum of the energy produced by the LV is converted into forward flow to perfuse the body organs. This matching between "the source" (LV) and "the load" (arterial circulation) is governed by the mechanical properties of these parts of cardiovascular system. Variety of pathological conditions change this coupling in such a way that may adversely affect the organ blood flow in the presence of unchanged or even high cardiac output, or significantly increase the metabolic demand on the LV for the maintenance of adequate systemic perfusion due to decrease of mechanical efficiency of the work produced by LV. Although effects of anesthetic agents on myocardial contractility and peripheral vascular tone were extensively studied in clinical conditions, little is known about their influence on ventriculo-arterial coupling. Propofol and inhalational agents appear to impair this equilibrium in animal experiments. This is not surprising, since these agents cause complex dose-dependent changes in many physiologic parameters, including myocardial contractility, left ventricular preload and afterload, diastolic properties of myocardium and baroreceptor control of hemodynamics. Although these properties of anesthetic agents have been delineated extensively, very limited data characterizing their influence on ventriculo-arterial coupling in clinical conditions exist. This information is especially meaningful while planning the anesthetic management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, where maintenance of circulatory homeostasis is of outmost importance. Since the main hemodynamic goal during anesthesia of the patient with cardiovascular disease is to provide optimal tissue perfusion with minimal myocardial oxygen demand, i.e. with maximal mechanical efficiency, knowledge of anesthetic induced changes in ventriculo-arterial coupling is extremely relevant from the clinical point of view. The most convenient method for the evaluation of ventriculo-arterial coupling is the analysis of the relationship between LV end-systolic elastance, load-independent measure of myocardial contractility, and effective arterial end-systolic elastance, measure mechanical loading conditions8. Physiological data necessary for the calculation of these parameters may be acquired in relatively non-invasive way by combining and analyzing together recording of arterial blood pressure waveform and data of changes of LV volume, which may be obtained by means of echocardiography. Objectives General The aim of the study is to delineate and compare the changes in ventriculo-arterial coupling caused by two popular anesthetic protocols commonly used in cardiac surgery (intravenous, based on the infusion of propofol, versus inhalational, based on isoflurane) on different stages of the surgery. Specific 1. To compare influence of two anesthetic protocols on myocardial contractility at the end of the surgery. 2. To assess net changes in effective arterial elastance produced by surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and evaluate possible differences between these two anesthetic protocols in respect to changes of arterial tone. 3. To evaluate the preservation of ventriculo-arterial coupling by two different anesthetic modes.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1, 2010
End Date
June 27, 2012
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Emergent surgery.
  • History of previous cardiac surgery.
  • Significant arrhythmias.
  • More than trivial valvular disorder.
  • Absence of written informed consent.
  • Contraindications for transesophageal echocardiography.
  • Pregnant women.

Arms & Interventions

Inhalational anesthesia

Group of patients undergoing the surgery under anesthesia based on inhalational anesthetic

Intervention: Isoflurane

TIVA

Group of patients undergoing the surgery under total intravenous anesthesia

Intervention: Propofol

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes of the relationship between left ventricular end-systolic elastance and effective arterial end-systolic elastance.

Time Frame: 15 minutes and 30 minutes after the induction of anesthesia in Inhalational Group and TIVA Group respectively, 15 minutes after the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, and before the transfer of the patient to the Intensive Care Unit in both groups

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes in vascular tone and cardiac afterload(15 minutes and 30 minutes after the induction of anesthesia in Inhalational Group and TIVA Group respectively, 15 minutes after the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, and before the transfer of the patient to the Intensive Care Unit in both groups)
  • Changes of measures of global systolic left ventricular function(15 minutes and 30 minutes after the induction of anesthesia in Inhalational Group and TIVA Group respectively, 15 minutes after the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, and before the transfer of the patient to the Intensive Care Unit in both groups)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials