Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05224479
NCT05224479WithdrawnNot Applicable

Clinical Validation of Machine Learning Triage of Chest Radiographs

Stanford University1 site in 1 countryStarted: August 1, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Withdrawn
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Turnaround time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to transform the practice of radiology, but real-world application of machine learning algorithms in clinical settings has been limited. An area in which machine learning could be applied to radiology is through the prioritization of unread studies in a radiologist's worklist. This project proposes a framework for integration and clinical validation of a machine learning algorithm that can accurately distinguish between normal and abnormal chest radiographs. Machine learning triage will be compared with traditional methods of study triage in a prospective controlled clinical trial. The investigators hypothesize that machine learning classification and prioritization of studies will result in quicker interpretation of abnormal studies. This has the potential to reduce time to initiation of appropriate clinical management in patients with critical findings. This project aims to provide a thoughtful and reproducible framework for bringing machine learning into clinical practice, potentially benefiting other areas of radiology and medicine more broadly.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Radiologists will be blinded when using machine learning and random triage methods.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Radiologist at Stanford Hospital and Clinics

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Traditional workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow standard triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Traditional workflow triage (Other)

Traditional workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow standard triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Machine learning workflow triage (Other)

Traditional workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow standard triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Random workflow triage (Other)

Machine learning workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow machine learning triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Traditional workflow triage (Other)

Machine learning workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow machine learning triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Machine learning workflow triage (Other)

Machine learning workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow machine learning triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Random workflow triage (Other)

Random workflow triage

Sham Comparator

Radiologists follow randomly ordered triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Traditional workflow triage (Other)

Random workflow triage

Sham Comparator

Radiologists follow randomly ordered triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Machine learning workflow triage (Other)

Random workflow triage

Sham Comparator

Radiologists follow randomly ordered triage of chest radiographs.

Intervention: Random workflow triage (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Turnaround time

Time Frame: up to 1 hour

Time from completion of radiograph to time that radiologist issues an assessment via preliminary or final report

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Emily Tsai

Clinical Assistant Professor

Stanford University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials