Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06069193
NCT06069193
Recruiting
N/A

Effects of Physical Touch on Treatment Outcomes and Patient Perception in Individuals With Back and Neck Pain: an Experimental Study

Philipps University Marburg Medical Center1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentOctober 2, 2023
ConditionsPain

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pain
Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in treatment expectation (Generic Rating for Treatment Pre-Experiences, Treatment Expectations, and Treatment Effects, G-EEE)
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of professional touch techniques on treatment expectations and adherence in German-speaking adults with current back or neck pain. Participants will engage in a 45-minute interaction, including structured components and physical touch interventions. We will assess treatment expectations, treatment effects, adherence, and participant motivation. Our study will provide insights into the role of touch in healthcare interactions and its influence on treatment outcomes.

Detailed Description

Research findings indicate that the interaction between healthcare professionals and patients can significantly influence both treatment expectations and their effectiveness. A compassionate, caring, and attentive doctor-patient interaction plays a crucial role in patient satisfaction and promotes accelerated recovery. Moreover, patient expectations are not solely shaped by interactions with healthcare providers but are also conceptualized through conditioning processes as one of the key mechanisms of the placebo effect. The effective performance of medical staff can further intensify patient expectations, contributing to an increased placebo response. While the effects of verbal communication on the placebo effect have been extensively studied, there is less research on the impact of nonverbal factors such as touch. Touch is a fundamental aspect of social interaction that can positively affect well-being and health. Touch is regarded as a mechanism for the positive health effects of social relationships and plays a significant role in bonding, communication, and reward. Physical touch can provide patients with a sense of presence and grounding, helping them feel seen, reassured, relaxed, and validated. In medical treatment, touch can enhance a sense of being taken seriously and cared for, thereby alleviating suffering and improving well-being. However, the full range of communicative potential in professional touch remains largely untapped, while a well-founded interdisciplinary synthesis is still lacking. For the planned study, we aim to recruit German-speaking adult participants who report current back or neck pain. Recruitment will be carried out through targeted outreach via various channels such as mailing lists, internet forums, and flyers. In an online experiment, we will initially assess baseline treatment expectations and current pain intensity. Subsequently, participants will be randomized into two experimental conditions. Participants will engage in a 45-minute interaction, comprising a structured opening, a brief interview, a standardized diagnostic examination, a detailed explanation of the pain relief cream, specific exercises, and a final farewell. Within the two experimental groups, physical interaction, specifically the application of professional touch techniques, in the form of procedural touch (serving diagnostic or therapeutic purposes), will be manipulated by aspiring pain specialists to examine its influence on various treatment parameters such as treatment expectations, treatment effects, treatment adherence, and participant motivation. Additionally, perceived empathy as well as warmth and competence of the treating person will be analyzed as relevant factors. Following the interaction, participants will be asked to perform specific exercises daily for one week and apply a placebo cream. Adherence to these medical and behavioral measures is a critical outcome criterion. At the end of the study, a systematic assessment of relevant behavioral parameters will be conducted to quantify potential changes in participants' behavior related to the interventions performed.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2, 2023
End Date
December 2024
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Present complaints of back or neck pain
  • Age of at least 18 years
  • Proficiency in the German language
  • Willingness to engage in daily short exercise routines

Exclusion Criteria

  • NRS \<3 at baseline (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain)
  • Presence of contraindications for physical activity, such as severe disc diseases
  • Presence of a severe medical condition
  • Initiation of new pain treatment

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in treatment expectation (Generic Rating for Treatment Pre-Experiences, Treatment Expectations, and Treatment Effects, G-EEE)

Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline); after the intervention (45 minutes after baseline)

Change from baseline in scores on the subscale for treatment expectations of the the generic rating scale for previous treatment experiences, treatment expectations, and treatment effects (GEEE) Treatment expectations are measured via the generic rating scale for previous treatment experiences, treatment expectations, and treatment effects (GEEE), subscale for previous treatment experiences and subscale for treatment expectations (Rief et al., 2021). Answers are provided on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 (each item has specific anchors with lower anchors always indicating no expected effects)

Change in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS))

Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline); after the intervention (45 minutes after baseline); Post-treatment (1-week after baseline)

Change in subjective pain intensity assessed using a numerical rating scales (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, with higher values reflecting more pain intensity.

Treatment effects (Generic Rating for Treatment Pre-Experiences, Treatment Expectations, and Treatment Effects, G-EEE)

Time Frame: Post-treatment (1-week after baseline)]

Treatment effects are measured via the generic rating scale for previous treatment experiences, treatment expectations, and treatment effects (GEEE), subscale for previous treatment experiences and subscale for treatment expectations (Rief et al., 2021). Answers are provided on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 (each item has specific anchors with lower anchors always indicating no expected effects)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Perceived physician empathy (The consultation and relational empathy (CARE))(After the intervention (45 minutes after baseline)])
  • Warmth and competence ratings of the practioner(After the intervention (45 minutes after baseline))
  • Adherence (Behavioral Measure)(Post-treatment (1-week after baseline))
  • Treatment adherence (Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS))(Post-treatment (1-week after baseline))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials