MedPath

Clinical Comparison of Application of Curcumin Gel in Pain Management After Free Gingival Graft Harvesting

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Palate; Wound
Interventions
Other: curcumin gel 2%
Registration Number
NCT05819632
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of using 2% curcumin gel versus gelatin sponge when applied to palatal donor site in pain management and wound healing after free gingival graft harvesting.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Systematically healthy patient (American Society of Anesthesiology class I and II).
  2. Male or female
  3. Patients with mucogingival defects scheduled for free gingival graft.
  4. Patients with good oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with any uncontrolled local or systemic disease where periodontal plastic surgery might be contraindicated.
  2. History of recent periodontal surgery at the donor site.
  3. Smokers.
  4. Pregnancy and lactation.
  5. Patients allergic to the used agents,
  6. Severe gagging reflex.
  7. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
curcumin gelcurcumin gel 2%the denuded palatal area will be superficially covered with a continuous thin layer of curcumin gel 2% one time immediately after the surgery (curcumin gel will be prepared in 2% concentration on a carbapol base)according to (Bhatia et al., 2014)
gelatine spongecurcumin gel 2%absorbable gelatin sponge will be cut to the palatal wound size and applied. Following manual compression of the wound area, both agents will be secured in place using compressive palatal sling sutures. commercial name (CUTANPLAST)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
post-operative painone week post operative

post -operative pain measured by visual analouge scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (highest pain value)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Re-epithelization of the palatal woundup to three weeks post-operative

Re-epithelization of the palatal wound using H2O2 test

Soft tissue healing of the palatal woundup to three weeks post-operative

Soft tissue healing of the palatal wound measured by Modified Landry's wound healing score from 1 indicates poorest healing to 5 indicates excellent healing

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry

🇪🇬

Cairo, Manial, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath