Clinical Comparison of Application of Curcumin Gel in Pain Management After Free Gingival Graft Harvesting
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Palate; Wound
- Interventions
- Other: curcumin gel 2%
- Registration Number
- NCT05819632
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of using 2% curcumin gel versus gelatin sponge when applied to palatal donor site in pain management and wound healing after free gingival graft harvesting.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
- Systematically healthy patient (American Society of Anesthesiology class I and II).
- Male or female
- Patients with mucogingival defects scheduled for free gingival graft.
- Patients with good oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with any uncontrolled local or systemic disease where periodontal plastic surgery might be contraindicated.
- History of recent periodontal surgery at the donor site.
- Smokers.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Patients allergic to the used agents,
- Severe gagging reflex.
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description curcumin gel curcumin gel 2% the denuded palatal area will be superficially covered with a continuous thin layer of curcumin gel 2% one time immediately after the surgery (curcumin gel will be prepared in 2% concentration on a carbapol base)according to (Bhatia et al., 2014) gelatine sponge curcumin gel 2% absorbable gelatin sponge will be cut to the palatal wound size and applied. Following manual compression of the wound area, both agents will be secured in place using compressive palatal sling sutures. commercial name (CUTANPLAST)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method post-operative pain one week post operative post -operative pain measured by visual analouge scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (highest pain value)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Re-epithelization of the palatal wound up to three weeks post-operative Re-epithelization of the palatal wound using H2O2 test
Soft tissue healing of the palatal wound up to three weeks post-operative Soft tissue healing of the palatal wound measured by Modified Landry's wound healing score from 1 indicates poorest healing to 5 indicates excellent healing
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry
🇪🇬Cairo, Manial, Egypt