MedPath

Japanese Phase 3 Study of Aflibercept in Neovascular Glaucoma Patients

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Glaucoma, Neovascular
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02396316
Lead Sponsor
Bayer
Brief Summary

To assess the efficacy and safety of the administration of aflibercept by intravitreal injection in comparison to sham to control intraocular pressure in patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
54
Inclusion Criteria
  • Japanese men and women aged 20 years or older,
  • Patients diagnosed as having Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) with neovascularization in the anterior segment (both iris and anterior chamber angle),
  • Patients with Intraocular pressure (IOP) higher than 25 mmHg in the study eye due to anterior segment (both iris and anterior chamber angle) neovascularization.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with angle-closure due to conditions other than Neovascular glaucoma
  • Patients with a known or suspected ocular or peri-ocular infection,
  • Patients with severe intraocular inflammation in the study eye,
  • Women who are pregnant, suspected of being pregnant or lactating,
  • Patients with known allergy to aflibercept.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AfliberceptAflibercept (Eylea, BAY 86-5321)Aflibercept 2 mg Intravitreal (IVT) injection group
Sham InjectionSham InjectionSham injection group
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to Pre-dose at Week 1From baseline to pre-dose at Week 1

It compared the change in IOP from baseline to pre-dose at Week 1 between the aflibercept group vs the sham group.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Subjects Who Had Improved Neovascularization of the Iris (NVI) Grade From Baseline to Pre-dose at Week 1From baseline to pre-dose at Week 1

NVI were assessed in the study eye using the NVI grading systems (grade 0 to grade 4). A subject who shows the improvement by at least one grade is considered to be improved. Percentage of subjects who had improved NVI grade was reported.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath