Exploring the views of women and healthcare professionals on whether we can run a future study comparing two types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
- Conditions
- Apical pelvic organ prolapseUrological and Genital Diseases
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN12229381
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity of Birmingham
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Ongoing
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
WP1:
1. Female (or assigned female at birth)
2. Age 18 years and above
3. Diagnosed with apical pelvic organ prolapse
4. Eligible for both colpocleisis and SSF procedures (or have already had one or both surgeries previously)
5. Ability to provide informed consent
6. Able to communicate in either English, Polish, Urdu, Punjabi or Welsh
WP2:
1. UK-based secondary care healthcare professionals involved in the care of women with apical pelvic organ prolapse (either currently or within the last 5 years)
2. Working in a UK complex uro-gynaecology centre
3. Able to give informed consent and speak English
WP3:
1. Females (or those assigned female at birth)
2. Age 18 years and above
3. Diagnosed with apical pelvic organ prolapse
4. Eligible for both colpocleisis and SSF procedures (i.e., no longer intend to have penetrative vaginal intercourse and who are willing to have either surgical procedure)
WP4:
1. Women as per WP1
2. Healthcare professionals as per WP2
3. Other stakeholders who might be involved in a future effectiveness trial, can converse in English, and who can give informed consent
WP1: There are no exclusion criteria
WP2: HCPs based in primary care
WP3: There are no exclusion criteria
WP4: There are no exclusion criteria
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method