DRKS00021600
Completed
Not Applicable
Minimally invasive vs conventional open bowel surgery: deciding the surgical strategy based on surgeon and patient specific factors, a retrospective analysis
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Salzburg0 sites106 target enrollmentJune 12, 2020
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- K56.7
- Sponsor
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Salzburg
- Enrollment
- 106
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •diagnosis bowel obstruction
Exclusion Criteria
- •Age \< 18 years, paralytic bowel obstruction without any mechanical obstruction, Patients with conservative Treatment alone
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Minimally invasive versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement: retrospective multicentre-studyI35.0Aortic (valve) stenosisDRKS00025211Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus5,000
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Minimally Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery (MISOS) in the treatment of spondylolisthesis; a randomised controlled trial.spondylolisthesisvertebral slippage100059591004154310009720NL-OMON50599neurochirurgie184
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomised trial of open versus laparoscopic colposuspension for genuine stress incontinenceStress incontinenceUrological and Genital DiseasesISRCTN14969683Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)290
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A comparison of keyhole surgeries vs traditional open surgeries for large intestinal cancers.Health Condition 1: C20- Malignant neoplasm of rectumCTRI/2019/12/022416Rishabh Mehta
Completed
Not Applicable
Quality of life measures after single access Vs Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomized Study.cholecystectomySurgery - Surgical techniquesACTRN12611000670976mansoura university50