DRKS00021600已完成不适用
Minimally invasive vs conventional open bowel surgery: deciding the surgical strategy based on surgeon and patient specific factors, a retrospective analysis
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Salzburg0 个研究点目标入组 106 人开始时间: 2020年6月12日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 106
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 one（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •diagnosis bowel obstruction
排除标准
- •Age < 18 years, paralytic bowel obstruction without any mechanical obstruction, Patients with conservative Treatment alone
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Minimally invasive versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement: retrospective multicentre-studyI35.0Aortic (valve) stenosisDRKS00025211Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus5,000
招募中
不适用
Minimally Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery (MISOS) in the treatment of spondylolisthesis; a randomised controlled trial.vertebral slippage100059591004154310009720spondylolisthesisNL-OMON50599neurochirurgie184
已完成
不适用
A randomised trial of open versus laparoscopic colposuspension for genuine stress incontinenceStress incontinenceUrological and Genital DiseasesISRCTN14969683Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)290
尚未招募
不适用
A comparison of keyhole surgeries vs traditional open surgeries for large intestinal cancers.CTRI/2019/12/022416Rishabh Mehta
已完成
不适用
Quality of life measures after single access Vs Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomized Study.cholecystectomySurgery - Surgical techniquesACTRN12611000670976mansoura university50