Safer Personalised Cancer Treatment Digital Follow-up
- Conditions
- Patient Reported Outcome Measure
- Interventions
- Device: Kaiku Health
- Registration Number
- NCT06476158
- Lead Sponsor
- Nordlandssykehuset HF
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate patient harm/ adverse events, overall survival and health related quality of life under treatment with immunotherapy medication in cancer patients when they are followed up by a personalized digital program where the patients report symptoms directly to health care personnel.
The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are:
* How often and how severe are immunotherapy related adverse events/ side effects when patients are followed up by a digital personalized patient-reporting system compared to standard follow-up?
* How are life quality and survival affected for patients followed up by a digital personalized patient-reporting system compared to follow-up standard follow-up??
Participants under immunotherapy cancer treatment will be followed up by a digital patient reporting program in one group, and compared to a group of cancer patients receiving the same treatment, but with standard follow-up without a digital program in another group. Researchers will compare the two groups to see if there any differences in how many patients who develop immunotherapy related patient harm and how long the patients live.
- Detailed Description
Cancer patients experience more frequently patient harm than other patients, mostly from systemic anticancer treatment. To reduce avoidable patient harm from modern cancer treatment such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies, precise and clinically relevant measurements are needed.
The study aims through three different sub-studies/ work pacages (WP) to develop electronic methods for measuring automatically injuries in cancer patients, and investigate if electronic patient follow-up (ePRO) can prevent injuries, affect quality of life and survival in patients receiving immunotherapy cancer treatment.
Research has shown that the recommended method for measuring patient harm and medication related adverse events is not specific or sensitive enough to detect cancer-related patient harm. In recent years, three patient harm measurement tools for cancer have been validated based on a manual retrospective review of the patient record. Based on existing technology and research, in WP1 the aim is to develop and validate a fully automatic patient harm measurement tool for retrospective detection of harm in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. The development of the technological solution is done by Datavarehuset Helse Nord and SAS Institute in an already existing solution (Nordic Clinical Analytics Framework - NCAF) which is used daily in all health trusts in Helse Nord, Northern Norway.
In order to prevent avoidable patient harm and adverse events, it is important to involve the patient in their own treatment. Research on follow-up with ePRO revealed more side effects, increased quality of life and overall survival in cancer patients.
In WP2, the technology developed in WP1 is used to prospectively examine whether follow-up with ePRO compared to standard follow-up results in less adverse events. In WP3, quality of life and survival are investigated with ePRO follow-up compared to standard follow-up. WP1 is a retrospective diagnostic study. WP2 and 3 are clinical cohort studies where a prospective intervention group of cancer patients are followed with ePRO during immunotherapy treatment and compared with a retrospective group of cancer patients followed with standard clinical follow-up. WP2 investigates rates, severity and types of immunotherapy related adverse events in patients monitored with ePRO compared to standard follow-up. WP3 investigates quality of life in the ePRO cohort, and overall survival in patients monitored to standard follow-up.
When the study is completed in 2027, the intention is to have developed and validated an automatic measurement tool for the detection of cancer-related injuries for general use nationally and internationally, and new knowledge about how and if digital follow-up with ePRO can affect patient harm and adverse events, quality of life and survival.
The study contributes to new knowledge about measurement of patient injuries and digital follow-up of cancer patients during active treatment with immunotherapy as a new standard of care in our region.
Adverse events are an additional burden for seriously ill cancer patients. By measuring adverse events that occur in cancer patients, we recognize that these events happen and is a part of oncology that need to be taken to account for each individual patient. Knowledge of the occurrence of adverse events in each individual department will be able to say something about status in each department, so measures can be taken at a system level to improve patient safety and the quality of the health service.
The use of personalized ePRO gives the patient the opportunity to participate actively in the course of their illness, regardless of where and who the patient is. Increased involvement of the patient inthe patient journey has shown to provide increased empowerment, safety, better quality of life and possible increase survival in other studies. Follow-up with ePRO makes it easier for healthcare personnel to detect early signs of potential injuries so that measures can be initiated faster to mitigate potential harm.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 900
- Above 18 years of age
- Cancer diagnosis as primary or secondary diagnosis according to the ICD-10 classification
- Receiving immunotherapy as systemic anticancer treatment reported with ATC codes for medications.
- Hematological cancer
- Gynecological cancer
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Digital follow-up with e-PROs Kaiku Health -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence and severity of immunotherapy related adverse events (irAEs) 3 years Incidence of irAEs per 100 patients and per patient, and severity of irAEs graded by Common Terminology Critera for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 0-5 where 0 is no harm, and 5 is death. Consequence of the irAEs are graded by National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index category E-I where E is an error contributing to or resulted in temporary harm and required intervention. I is the maximum value, where an error occurred that may have contributed to or resulted in a patient death.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall survival 3 years Implement personalised ePRO immunotherapy follow-up and investigate overall survival compared to standard of care from cancer diagnosis to death, and from start of immunotherapy treatment and intervention to death in the two comparing groups.
Health related quality of life 3 years Implement personalised ePRO immunotherapy follow-up and investigate QoL in intervention group by EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 including global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) and symptom scales at baseline ( at start cancer treatment), 3, 6 and 12 months under cancer treatment. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL but a high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. Firstly an estimate of the average of the items that contribute to the scale; this is the raw score. Then a linear transformation is used to standardise the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Nordlandssykehuset HF
🇳🇴Bodø, Nordland, Norway