MedPath

The Effect of Personalized Exercise Interventions for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Registration Number
NCT06962579
Lead Sponsor
Universiteit Antwerpen
Brief Summary

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and common side effect of neurotoxic cancer treatment. The most frequent symptoms include sensory disturbances and weakness in the hands and/or feet. CIPN can interfere with both daily activities and cancer treatment itself. Although there is proof of concept for physical activity as a preventive measure for CIPN, physical activity is currently not included in the international evidence-based guideline for the prevention of CIPN due to the need of larger sample-sized definitive studies. The aim of this project is, on the one hand, to investigate the preventive effect of an exercise program based on international physical activity guidelines on CIPN symptoms in patients with breast or colorectal cancer undergoing taxane- or platinum-based chemotherapy. On the other hand, the study will also explore how patients and healthcare professionals experience the implementation of physical activity during this phase of therapy. A prospective randomized controlled trial will be conducted, with CIPN symptoms as the primary outcome measure.

Detailed Description

The scientific goals of the project are:

1. The primary scientific objective of the study is to determine the effect of a patient-tailored exercise program based on exercise guidelines in oncology on sensory symptoms of CIPN (QLQ-CIPN20, sensory subscale) at short term (12 weeks) compared to usual care.

2. The secondary scientific objectives entail to examine if the exercise program has beneficial short (i.e., 12 weeks) and- or long term (i.e., 24 weeks) effects on symptoms of CIPN (QLQ-CIPN20, motor and autonomic subscale) and other biopsychosocial outcomes related to CIPN: (1) Signs of CIPN, (2) Physical functioning, (3) Psychosocial functioning, and (4) Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy.

3. The tertiary objective of this study is to perform a process evaluation. The aim of this process evaluation is to investigate the barriers and facilitators of the exercise program in patients receiving taxane- or platinum-based chemotherapy by examining adherence to the exercise program as well as how patients and healthcare providers perceive the implementation of the exercise program.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
206
Inclusion Criteria
  • age above 18 years
  • a primary diagnosis of breast, gynaecological or colon cancer, without distant metastasis
  • been chemotherapy naïve
  • been scheduled for at least 12 weeks of taxane- or platinum-based chemotherapy without other neurotoxic chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
  • life expectancy of less than six months according to the patient's oncologist or designee
  • advanced stage of disease
  • having a known current neuropathy
  • having cognitive or physical limitations that contraindicate participation in a low- to moderate intensity home-based walking and progressive resistance program (determined by the patient's oncologist)
  • not able to read and understand Dutch
  • not able to provide informed consent
  • not able to participate during the entire study period
  • pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) sensory symptom severityat 12 weeks follow-up

To evaluate the primary outcome sensory symptoms of CIPN, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale will be used (QLQ-CIPN20 sensory subscale, score range from 9 to 36, higher scores indicating more sensory symptoms or problems).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) sensory, motor and autonomic symptom severityat 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

To evaluate the sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms of CIPN, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale will be used (QLQ-CIPN20). Each subscale score will be linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden.

Relative dose intensity chemotherapy (%)at 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy, calculated as the ratio of delivered dose intensity to the planned dose intensity, expressed as a percentage.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) signsat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

The Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc) is used to evaluate motor symptoms, pin sensation, vibration sensibility, tendon reflexes and strength in the hands and feet (score range 0-20, higher scores indicating greater severity of neuropathy).

Pain severity hands and feetat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Pain severity in the hands and feet will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Four VAS scales will be completed: pain intensity at the present moment, mean pain intensity (global average pain intensity over the past week), maximum pain intensity (pain intensity at its maximum over the past week) and minimum pain intensity (pain intensity at its minimum over the past week).

General pain location and interferenceat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Pain location and pain interference will be evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), including a body diagram to identify painful body areas and a pain interference section measuring how pain impacts various aspects of daily life, including mood, sleep, work and social activities (score range 0-70, higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Physical functioningat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 Physical Function 8a questionnaire (scores expressed as T-scores with a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general population, higher scores mean a better outcome).

Self-reported physical activityat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Self-reported levels of physical activity are measured using the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Objective physical activityat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Minutes spent in different intensity zones (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous) will be collected using a Fitbit device.

Fatigueat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (score range 20-100, higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Sleep disturbanceat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Sleep Disturbance 8a questionnaire (scores expressed as T-scores with a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general population, higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Depressionat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Depression 8a questionnaire (scores expressed as T-scores with a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general population, higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Anxietyat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Anxiety 8a questionnaire (scores expressed as T-scores with a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general population, higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Social participationat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 Ability to participate in social roles and activities 8a questionnaire (scores expressed as T-scores with a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general population, higher scores mean a better outcome).

Supportat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 Emotional support 4a, PROMIS Short Form v2.0 Instrumental support 4a and PROMIS Short Form v2.0 Informational support 4a questionnaires (scores expressed as T-scores with a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general population, higher scores mean a better outcome).

Cognitive functionat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (score range 0-100, higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Health-related quality of lifeat 12 and 24 weeks follow-up

Evaluated with the EuroQol-5Dimensions-5Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, including the index score (based on the Belgian value set) and the EQ VAS (range 0-100), with higher scores indicating better health outcomes.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Antwerp University Hospital

🇧🇪

Edegem, Belgium

University Hospital Leuven

🇧🇪

Leuven, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath