Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00817869
NCT00817869
Completed
Not Applicable

Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Flooring to Reduce Injuries From Falls in Elderly Care Units

University of Portsmouth8 sites in 1 country571 target enrollmentApril 2010

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Accidental Falls
Sponsor
University of Portsmouth
Enrollment
571
Locations
8
Primary Endpoint
fall-related injury
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In hospitals, older people can fall and hurt themselves. The investigators want to see if a new type of flooring can help stop people hurting themselves as badly, if they accidentally fall.

Detailed Description

We will carry out the study in eight elderly care wards across England. We will first study the wards for up to 6 months. Then, half of the wards will have the new floor laid. Wards will be chosen to receive the new floor, or remain with a standard floor, by chance. The new floor has 'shock-absorbent' properties. We will study all the wards for another 12 months. This will allow us to compare the new flooring with the normal flooring.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2010
End Date
August 2011
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Martin Severs

Professor

University of Portsmouth

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • all patients admitted to the study area on a participating elderly care ward

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

fall-related injury

Time Frame: Study duration = 18 months. Outcome measured for each patient for duration of stay in ward (approx. 30 days).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of falls(Study duration = 18 months. Outcome measured for each patient for duration of stay in ward (approx. 30 days).)
  • Slip resistance of flooring(Measured at 4 time-points over 1.5 years (1 month; 6 months; 12 months; 18 months))
  • Place of residence (for cost-effectiveness analysis)(Each patient followed-up 3 months post-discharge)
  • Quality of life (for cost-effectiveness analysis)(Each patient followed-up 3 months post-discharge)
  • Unexpected adverse events(Study duration = 18 months. Outcome measured for each patient for duration of stay in ward (approx. 30 days).)
  • Number of hospital re-admissions (for cost-effectiveness analysis)(Each patient followed-up 3 months post-discharge)
  • Shock-absorbency of flooring(Measured at 4 time-points over 1.5 years (1 month; 6 months; 12 months; 18 months))
  • User views (patients and staff)(Collected during 1 year follow-up of intervention sites (months 6 to 18))

Study Sites (8)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials