For patients with an acute fragility fracture of the distal femur, is there a clinical and cost-effectiveness difference between locking plate fixation and retrograde intramedullary nail fixation?

niversity of Oxford0 个研究点目标入组 23 人开始时间: 2016年5月26日最近更新: 2023年6月26日

适应症

试验速览

2017 Protocol article in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137679 protocol 2019 Results article in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549959 results (added 27/09/2019) 2019 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31061043/ results (added 04/06/2020) 2019 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31371167/ feasibility results (added 14/06/2023) 2019 Results article in https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-019-3597-8 mixed methods process evaluation (added 14/06/2023)

•1. Patients of 18 years old and above
•2. Present to participating hospitals with a fracture of the distal femur (i.e. involving the distal 2 Muller squares)
•3. Attending surgeon feels that the patient will benefit from internal fixation of the fracture

•1. Patients who have a knee or hip arthroplasty that requires revision
•2. A pre-existing arthroplasty that precludes fixation with an intramedullary nail
•3. Patients with pre-existing femoral deformity will also be excluded

发起方