Tidal Volume Challenge to Reliably Predict Fluid Responsivness in Critically ill patient
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To Study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of both tests for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with hemodynamic instability
研究概览
简要总结
| Volume expansion is a cornerstone treatment of acute circulatory failure like during the early hours in patients with septic shock, but it can be a cause of therapeutic dilemma because fluid overload can lead to acute kidney injury, prolongation of mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and higher mortality rates. |
Predicting fluid responsiveness with a reliable, easy, and rapid way is essential to know when to start and when to stop fluid therapy especially as patients may react differently to VE.
Static hemodynamic parameters like inferior vena cava diameter and central venous pressure are unreliable and cannot predict FR precisely; contrarily, dynamic parameters that depend on cyclic changes in cardiac preload caused by mechanical ventilation, leading to variation of stroke volume or pulse pressure have proven to be reliable when predicting FR in hemodynamically unstable patient
PPV is a common dynamic parameter that can predict FR reliably and can be recorded through most of recent bedside monitors easily using arterial lines; also, it does not need CO monitoring or any other maneuvers to be done.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Not Applicable
- 盲法
- Not Applicable
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adult patients more than 18 years with hemodynamic instability who are intubated and mechanically ventilated with volume assist-control and using low tidal volume strategy.
排除标准
- •Age less than 18 years 2.Contraindication for PPV( Spontaneous breathing,cardiac arrthymias,open chest,right-side heart failure,pulmonary or intraabdominal hypertension)
- •Non consenting.
结局指标
主要结局
To Study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of both tests for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with hemodynamic instability
时间窗: 18 month
次要结局
- 1. See compare hemodynamic changes in 2 groups(2. Side effect of fluid bolus)
