MedPath

Improving Ultrasound Images in Brain Tumor Surgery With the Use of Brain Mimicking Fluid

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Brain Neoplasms
Glioma
Interventions
Biological: brain mimicking fluid
Registration Number
NCT02105233
Lead Sponsor
St. Olavs Hospital
Brief Summary

Prognosis in patients with glioblastomas (the most aggressive high-grade glioma) remains unfavourable. Tools for improving brain tumor surgery, in particular for gliomas, are increasing. There seems to be an agreement that achieving extensive resections, when done safely without jeopardizing neurological function, improves survival.

Ultrasound is currently used as a tool for providing 2D or 3D images for the purpose of tumor localization and resection control. For the use in resection control the resection cavity is filled with saline to provide acoustic coupling between the ultrasound transducer and tissue. However, attenuation of acoustic waves is very low in saline compared to the brain and this difference in attenuation is the cause of artifacts that may severely degrade the ultrasound images. Such artifacts are seen as high-intensity signal at the resection cavity wall and beyond, potentially masking small tumor remnants and generally making the interpretation of images more difficult.

This research group has developed an acoustic fluid intended for use in the resection cavity instead of saline. Tests in laboratory measurements have shown that the fluid reduces artifacts and has the potential to enhance ultrasound image quality in brain tumor surgery. The investigators expect that the acoustic fluid will make it easier to detect small tumor remnants near the end of an operation, thus increasing success of glioma surgery. The purpose of this study is to test the fluid during surgery for histopathologically proven glioblastoma to assess safety and efficacy.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  • A glioblastoma is suspected when there is a solitary brain tumour with ring-like contrast enhancement and oedema with no recent history (last 3 years) of primary tumour elsewhere
  • In cases where histopathology is not known from previous biopsy or resection (i.e. diagnosis is suspected based on MRI findings and not from previous surgery) a tissue sample for frozen section is necessary. The fluid will only be used in cases where glioblastoma is suggested from this preliminary histopathological assessment.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Intended biopsy only (meaning: cases not suitable for resection)
  • Other entities than glioblastoma is suspected
  • Allergy to diary products and marine products
  • Hypersensitvity to egg protein
  • Hypersensitivity to soya or peanut protein
  • Hypersensitvity to glycerol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BMGbrain mimicking fluidbrain mimicking fluid
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
adverse eventsup to 6 months

All adverse events registered but with special emphasis on:

unusual clinical events, neurological deterioration or reduced consciousness

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
image signal-to-noise ratio1 day

after the operation: image analysis by quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

image quality1 day

during the operation

* Qualitative score of ultrasound image quality (poor-medium-good)

* Qualitative score of artefacts in ultrasound images (none-some-much)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Neurosurgery, St Olavs Hospital

🇳🇴

Trondheim, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath