Cryolipolysis for Jawline Contouring
- Conditions
- Body Fat Disorder
- Registration Number
- NCT03352141
- Lead Sponsor
- Zeltiq Aesthetics
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-invasive reduction of subcutaneous fat along the jawline with Cryolipolysis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADE) Enrollment through study completion, an average of 6 months. This outcome measurement considered all unanticipated device- or procedure-related adverse effects.
Number of Before and After Side-by-side Photograph Pairs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded, Independent Reviewers Baseline through 12 weeks post second treatment. Change in the treated vs. untreated areas will be assessed by observation of changes in surface contour and/or fat volume by an independent photo review of pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment images of the treated areas. Reviewers will be practicing dermatologists or plastic surgeons. All reviewers will be blinded to post-treatment vs. baseline untreated area. The order in which photographs will be presented will be randomized; for each subject placement of the baseline and pre-treatment image will be randomized for each pair of subject images. Reviewers will be asked to select the baseline photos for each subject photo series and record selections on a data collection form. Success is defined as 75% correct identification of pre-treatment photos by 2 out of 3 reviewers.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Fat Layer in the Treated Jawline Area Baseline and 12 weeks post-final treatment. When compared to baseline ultrasound imaging, the change in fat layer thickness at the final post-treatment visit will be measured. Ultrasound measurements were obtained in 5 areas intended for treatment at the baseline visit. A template was created for identification of the locations for subsequent measurements using external landmarks (e.g. skin imperfections) as reference points. The Treatment Effect = Follow-Up Average Thickness - Baseline Average Thickness. A negative change reflects a decrease in the average thickness from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit, and a positive result reflects an increase.
Overall Satisfaction With the Treatment 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit Subject satisfaction with the CoolSculpting procedure will be assessed by a questionnaire administered at the 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit. The questionnaire will consist of 5-point Likert questions with 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = dissatisfied; 3 = not sure; 4 = satisfied and 5 = very satisfied. Positive responses (very satisfied and satisfied) will be reported.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pacific Derm
🇨🇦Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pacific Derm🇨🇦Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada