Comparative Effects of Autogenic Inhibition vs Reciprocal Inhibition in Patients With Lower Cross Syndrome
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 46
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Lumbar Extensor Muscle Length
研究概览
简要总结
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Autogenic Inhibition Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Reciprocal Inhibition MET in individuals with Lower Crossed Syndrome. Participants will be randomly assigned to two intervention groups. One group will receive Autogenic Inhibition MET, while the other will receive Reciprocal Inhibition MET for the iliopsoas, rectus femoris, and erector spinae muscles. Both groups will also perform the same standardized strengthening exercises targeting the transversus abdominis, gluteus maximus, and gluteus medius muscles to improve muscle balance and functional outcomes.
详细描述
Participants who meet the eligibility criteria and provide informed consent will be randomly allocated into two experimental groups using a randomization method. The intervention will be carried out over a period of six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week, making a total of 18 sessions for each participant. Before the commencement of each treatment session, all participants will receive a 10-minute hot pack application over the lumbar region to promote muscle relaxation, reduce soft tissue stiffness, and prepare the muscles for manual therapy. Following the hot pack, participants will receive the assigned Muscle Energy Technique (MET) according to their respective group.
Participants in Experimental Group 1 will receive Autogenic Inhibition Muscle Energy Technique (Modified Post-Facilitation Stretch Protocol) targeting the iliopsoas, rectus femoris, and erector spinae muscles. The therapist will position the involved muscle at its initial barrier, after which the participant will perform an isometric contraction of approximately 20-30% of maximal effort for 7-10 seconds against the therapist's resistance. After relaxation, the muscle will be gently stretched to the new barrier and the stretch will be maintained for 30 seconds. This procedure will be repeated 3-5 times for each muscle during every treatment session.
Participants in Experimental Group 2 will receive Reciprocal Inhibition Muscle Energy Technique for the same muscle groups. The therapist will position the muscle at the initial barrier, and the participant will perform an isometric contraction of the antagonist muscle using approximately 20-30% of maximal effort for 7-10 seconds. Following relaxation, the therapist will move the muscle to the new barrier and maintain the stretch for 30 seconds. The technique will also be repeated 3-5 times for each targeted muscle during every treatment session.
Both groups will follow an identical strengthening exercise program to address the weak muscles commonly associated with Lower Crossed Syndrome. The strengthening program will target the transversus abdominis, gluteus maximus, and gluteus medius muscles using progressive therapeutic exercises prescribed according to the participant's tolerance. During the first two weeks, the intervention will primarily emphasize improving flexibility and reducing muscle tightness through the assigned MET. From Week 3 to Week 6, participants will continue receiving their allocated MET while simultaneously performing the strengthening exercises to restore muscle balance, improve lumbopelvic stability, and enhance functional performance. Exercise intensity and repetitions will be progressed gradually throughout the intervention while maintaining proper technique and patient comfort.
The treatment duration, session frequency, hot pack application, strengthening protocol, therapist supervision, and progression of exercises will remain identical for both groups. The only difference between the two groups will be the type of Muscle Energy Technique employed-Autogenic Inhibition MET in Experimental Group 1 and Reciprocal Inhibition MET in Experimental Group 2. Outcome measures will be recorded before and after completion of the intervention period to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of both treatment approaches in improving pain, muscle flexibility, lumbar range of motion, posture, and functional disability among individuals with Lower Crossed Syndrome.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age 19-35 years.
- •Both genders will include in this study.
- •According to Janda's Approach, Clinical diagnosis of LCS based on ≥3 positive clinical tests.
- •Patient with positive modified Thomas test, Patients with a positive testing of prone hip extension test, Patients with a positive test of trunk flexion test, Patients with tight erector spinae muscles.
- •Participants with no lumbar pain to moderate lumbar pain (NPRS0-6) will be included.
- •Painless movement and activity.
- •Pain only produced by sustained loading in relevant position, which is then relieved after maintaining a corrected posture for 5 minutes, indicating posture-related pain.
排除标准
- •Leg symptoms when walking, eased in flexion (Signs of stenosis)
- •Pain due to repetitive movement
- •Lumbar Radiculopathy
- •Neurological Symptoms (Paresthesia/numbness)
- •Structural deformity (Kyphosis, lordosis, scoliosis, spondylosis, spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis)
研究组 & 干预措施
Autogenic Inhibtion (Group A)
Group A will receive Autogenic inhibition using PFS, preceded by 10 minutes heating pad application. 30% Isometric contraction(7-10 sec), followed by relaxation & 30 sec stretch, will be repeated 3-5 time. From Weeks 3-6, strenghtening exercises for hip extensors & Transverse Abdominis will be performed.
干预措施: Autogenic Inhibition (Group A) (Procedure)
Reciprocal Inhibition (Group B)
Group B will receive Reciprocal Inhibition using using MET,preceding by a 10 minute heating pad application. A 30% isometric contraction(7-10 sec) of antagonist muscle, followed by relaxation & 30-60sec passive stretch, will be repeated 3-5 times. From 3-6 weeks strenghening exercises for hip extensor & transverse abdominis will be performed.
干预措施: Reciprocal Inhibition (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Lumbar Extensor Muscle Length
时间窗: Baseline & after 6 weeks of intervention.
The Modified Schober's Test will be used to assess lumbar extensor muscle length and lumbar spine mobility. The increase in distance between standardized spinal landmarks during maximal forward flexion will be measured and recorded in centimeters (cm). A greater increase in distance indicates greater lumbar extensor flexibility or length.
Functional Movement dysfunction
时间窗: Baseline and after 6 Weeks of intervention.
Functional Movement Screen will be used to assess functional movement dysfunction. It consists of seven tests, scored on a 0-3 scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate greater movement dysfunction.
Back Pain
时间窗: Baseline and after 6 Weeks of intervention.
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants reporting pain intensity scores of 0-6 on the NPRS will be eligible for inclusion in the study.
Functional Disability
时间窗: Baseline and after 6 Weeks of intervention
Functional disability will be assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire, with each item consisting of six response options.
Lumbar Range Of Motion
时间窗: Baseline and after 6 Weeks of invention
Lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) will be assessed using inclinometer, including lumbar flexion, extension, and lateral flexion. Lumbar ROM will be determined by measuring the difference between the readings obtained at the T12 and S2 spinal landmarks.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
