A Clinical Comparison of 2 Multifocal Toric XR (Extended Range) Contact Lenses
- Conditions
- Astigmatism
- Interventions
- Device: omafilcon BDevice: comfilcon A
- Registration Number
- NCT03006458
- Lead Sponsor
- Coopervision, Inc.
- Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the comfilcon A and the omafilcon B soft contact lenses.
- Detailed Description
This will be a randomized, subject-masked, crossover, bilateral study, controlled by cross comparison. Thirty subjects will use each lens type for two weeks in random sequence. Follow-up visits for each lens will be performed after two weeks of wear. Lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis.
The final optical design of comfilcon A contact lens was optimized to improve the quality and two further studies (CV-18-10 and CV-18-11) were conducted after completion of this study to evaluate the modified optical design.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
-
Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:
-
They are aged 40 - 70 years, inclusive.
-
They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
-
They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
-
They have successfully completed the non-dispensing study (C16-597) as the lenses to be worn on this study (C16-599) are predetermined from their participation on study C16-597.
-
They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +10.00 to -10.00D (Diopters) (inclusive).
-
They have astigmatism between of -0.75 and -5.75DC (based on the calculated ocular refraction) in each eye.
-
They have an Add component to their spectacle refraction (between +0.75 and
+2.50DS).
-
They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lenses.
-
They can attain at least 0.30 logMAR binocular distance high contrast visual acuity with the study lenses within the available power range.
-
They have successfully worn soft contact lenses in the last two years.
-
They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least six hours per day).
-
They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
-
They own a wearable pair of spectacles.
-
-
Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:
- They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
- They have had cataract surgery.
- They have had corneal refractive surgery.
- They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
- They are pregnant or breast-feeding.
- They have any clinically meaningful slit lamp findings contraindicating contact lens wear (e.g. ≥ Grade 3 finding of oedema, corneal neovascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection, blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction) on the Efron classification scale or any other ocular abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator would contraindicate contact lens wear.
- They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
- They have a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
- They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description omafilcon B omafilcon B Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study. comfilcon A comfilcon A Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study. The final optical design of comfilcon A contact lens was optimized to improve the quality and two further studies (CV-18-10 and CV-18-11) were conducted after completion of this study to evaluate the modified optical design.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance 2 weeks Overall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Comfort 2 weeks Subjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Stability 2 weeks Investigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Overall Satisfaction 2 weeks Subjective ratings for overall satisfaction for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=extremely satisfied
Dryness 2 weeks Subjective ratings for dryness assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry; 100=no dryness experienced at any time
Visual Fluctuation/ Stability 2 weeks Subjective ratings for visual fluctuation/stability assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=totally unstable/ fluctuation/changing; 100=perfectly stable/not fluctuation/changing
Handling 2 weeks Subjective ratings for handling difficulty assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=very difficult, 100=very easy
Quality of Near Vision 2 weeks Subjective ratings for quality of near vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Intermediate Vision 2 weeks Subjective ratings for quality of intermediate vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Distance Vision 2 weeks Subjective ratings for quality of distance vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Night 2 weeks Subjective ratings for quality of vision while driving at night. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Ghosting at Near 2 weeks Subjective ratings for ghosting at near assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Day 2 weeks Subjective rating for quality of vision while driving during the day. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Ghosting at Distance 2 weeks Subjective ratings for ghosting at distance assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Eurolens Research
🇬🇧Manchester, United Kingdom