MedPath

Indirect Pulp Capping Versus Pulpotomy With MTA for Treatment of Primary Molars With Deep Caries

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Pulpotomy
Indirect Pulp Capping
Interventions
Combination Product: MTA
Registration Number
NCT05554952
Lead Sponsor
Minia University
Brief Summary

The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of indirect pulp capping and pulpotomy with MTA in treatment of primary teeth with deep caries over a 12-month follow-up period.

Detailed Description

Output patients coming to Pediatric dentistry department Minia University, selected randomly to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of indirect pulp capping and pulpotomy with MTA in treatment of primary teeth with deep caries over a 12-month follow-up period an equivalent parallel randomized controlled trial

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
    • 4 to 6 years old patients presented with deep carious lesions in primary molars.
  • Apparently healthy children (ASA I, II classification).
  • Co-operative children (Rating 3 & 4 according to Frankle classification)
Exclusion Criteria

A) Clinical:

  • Non restorable primary molars.

  • Presence of clinical pathology.

  • Presence of mobility or tenderness to percussion.

    • Spontaneous pain.

B) Radiographic:

  • Pre-operative radiographs showed external or internal root resorption.
  • Presence of furcal radiolucency.
  • Presence of periapical radiolucency or widened periodontal ligament space
  • More than one-third root resorption detected.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 1MTAIndirect pulp capping with MTA
Group 2MTAPulpotomy with MTA
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical and radiographic evaluation2 years follow up

The children will be recalled for postoperative clinical and radiographic assessment at the following intervals: 3, 6, 12 months the treatment will be considered successful if none of the following clinical or radiographic findings is present:

Clinical criteria:

1. pain

2. tenderness to palpation or percussion

3. gingival swelling or sinus tract

4. purulent exudate expressed from the gingival margin

5. abnormal tooth mobility

Radiographic criteria:

1. periapical radiolucency

2. widening in peridontal ligament space

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Minia University

🇪🇬

Minya, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath