Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02914431
NCT02914431
Completed
Not Applicable

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Accuracy of Maxillary Repositioning Using Personalized Titanium Plates vs CAD/CAM Surgical Splints in Orthognathic Surgery

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University1 site in 1 country64 target enrollmentSeptember 6, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Malocclusion
Sponsor
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Enrollment
64
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Difference of the maxillary position
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether personalized titanium plates can achieve better accuracy than CAD/CAM surgical splint in maxilla repositioning in orthognathic surgery, and evaluate the feasibility of this technique in clinical application.

Detailed Description

The repositioning of maxillary segment is essential for esthetic and functional outcomes in orthognathic surgery. With the giant leap in three-dimensional (3D) computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) technology development, surgeons are now able to simulate various surgical plans in a computer to achieve the best possible outcome. In order to transfer the virtual surgical plan to the patient at the time of the surgery, surgical splints manufactured by computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique has been traditionally used to intraoperative reposition the maxilla. Nonetheless, the position of maxilla is still dependent to mandibular autorotation. The instability of the mandibular condyle-fossa relationship is a potential problem that may directly affect the placement of the maxillary segment at the desired position. Personalized titanium plates manufactured using titanium 3D printing technique have been used for maxilla repositioning and fixation to improve the operative accuracy in orthognathic surgery. Despite this, the evidence for advantage of this personalized titanium plates technique is not very strong and based on only a few studies. The purpose of this study is to determine whether personalized titanium plates can achieve better accuracy than CAD/CAM surgical splint in maxilla repositioning in orthognathic surgery. The accuracy of using both methods for maxilla repositioning was quantitatively evaluated using linear and angular measurement. Secondary outcomes include operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, preoperative preparation time and treatment cost will also be measured to evaluate the feasibility of clinical application of personalized titanium plates technique in orthognathic surgery.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 6, 2017
End Date
April 30, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

wang xu dong

Director of Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients who were diagnosed with skeletal dentofacial deformity and scheduled to undergo orthognathic surgery including maxillary surgery
  • patients who were scheduled to undergo a computed tomography (CT) scan as a part of their diagnosis and treatment
  • patients who agreed to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who had the previous orthognathic surgery
  • Patients who had the previous maxillary or mandibular trauma
  • Patients who had the maxillofacial tumor
  • Patients who required the segmental maxillary surgery
  • Oral soft tissues defect
  • Within the infection period
  • Craniofacial syndromes
  • Bone metabolism disturbance
  • Allergic to the titanium implant
  • Unable to give informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Difference of the maxillary position

Time Frame: 3 days after the operation

Three landmark points (Upper dental midline between the 2 maxillary central incisal embrasure and both side mesiobuccal cusp of the upper 1st molar) were adopted on the maxilla, and the coordinates of these three landmarks were used to calculate the centroid of the maxilla. Positional differences of the centroid of the maxilla between the virtual plan and the actual result were measured.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Operative time(Operative day)
  • Intraoperative blood loss(Operative day)
  • Translational differences of the maxilla(3 days after the operation)
  • Orientational differences of the maxilla(3 days after the operation)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials