Comparison of Different Types of Prosthetic Foott
- Conditions
- the Previous Prosthetic Foot Experience of Patients With Amputation
- Interventions
- Other: Prosthetic foot questionnaire
- Registration Number
- NCT05691998
- Lead Sponsor
- Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to determine the experiences of patients with different types of prostetic feet (carbon, hydraulic or microprocessor controlled).
- Detailed Description
One of the main goals in the rehabilitation of amputees is to provide optimal and natural ambulation. For this purpose, suitable socket-suspension type, appropriate knee joint and foot should be prescribed. In the selection of feet, the age, occupation, characteristics of the geographical region, mental status and activity level should be considered. In addition, the previous prosthesis experience of the people should definitely be taken into account during prosthesis prescribing.The main purpose of this study is to determine the experiences of patients with different types of prostetic feet (carbon, hydraulic or microprocessor controlled).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Aged between 18-65 years
- Lower limb amputation
- Having used at least 2 different foot types (carbon, hydrolic, microprocessor-controlled)
- Having used the single type of foot until now
- Presence of neurological, cardiovascular, and pulmonary disease that may affect walking performance
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients Prosthetic foot questionnaire the previous prosthesis experience
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Qestion 2 through study completion, an average of one and a half months Walking on uneven terrain
Qestion 1 through study completion, an average of one and a half months Walking on the straight road
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method