MedPath

Virtual Intervention for Vertebral frActure: a Pilot, Feasibility Study for a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Osteoporosis
Fractures, Spinal
Registration Number
NCT06650410
Lead Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Brief Summary

Spine fractures are the most common fracture due to osteoporosis. They happen during falls or activities of daily life, like bending to tie shoes. Fractures of the spine can result in pain, which can sometimes last for a long time. Spine fractures can affect breathing, appetite, digestion, and mobility, and can restrict or modify people's work or daily activities. There are no standard rehabilitation programs after spine fracture, and patients often have to pay for rehabilitation. Rehabilitation can be hard to access, especially in rural or remote locations. It can be hard to find health care or rehabilitation providers who specialize in treating spine fractures. After reviewing research and consulting patients and health care providers to understand their experiences with spine fracture rehabilitation, the research team developed a toolkit for a virtual rehabilitation program for people with spine fractures, called VIVA.

The research team wants to submit a grant for a clinical trial to implement VIVA in five provinces and determine if VIVA reduces pain and improves physical functioning and quality of life, and if the benefits outweigh the costs. Before this, the team proposes to do a pilot study to test how feasible it is to do a study of VIVA in three provinces.

Detailed Description

A multicenter trial will be conducted to investigate the feasibility of a future trial of VIVA in adults with spine fractures in Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec. As secondary outcomes, the research team will explore the effect of the intervention on physical function and balance, pain, fear of movement, falls, falls self-efficacy, quality of life, mood, nutrition risk, and physical activity. Adults over the age of 50 who have had at least one spine fracture in the past two years due to osteoporosis will be recruited. Participants will be randomized either to the immediate receipt of VIVA intervention; or delayed receipt of VIVA 10 weeks post-randomization. The VIVA intervention involves once weekly 1:1 rehabilitation sessions delivered by an exercise professional for eight weeks. The study will take place at the GERAS Centre (Ontario), Unity Health (Ontario), University of British Columbia (British Columbia), and McGill University Health Centre (Quebec). University of Waterloo will be the coordinating centre. The findings of this study will be used to decide if a larger clinical trial is feasible.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • have had at least one vertebral fracture in the past two years confirmed by a radiology report
  • willing to participate in once weekly virtual rehabilitation sessions for 8 weeks
  • have access to internet and a smart device with a camera and microphone.
Exclusion Criteria
  • have cauda equina syndrome or spinal cord injury or spinal cord injury
  • had a traumatic fracture (i.e., car accident); an active infection; active inflammatory arthritis with a flare up within the past two years
  • an inability to follow two-step commands or understand instructions and are without a caregiver to support participation
  • been participating in a similar rehabilitation program for vertebral fractures delivered by a physical therapist, exercise physiologist or kinesiologist and includes exercise
  • any surgeries planned or health problems that might cause their health to change significantly in the next 3 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
AdherenceThrough the 8-week intervention period

The adherence will be reported as the proportion of scheduled sessions participants attend.

A future trial will be feasible if the adherence to the intervention sessions is 75%.

RecruitmentThrough the 5-month recruitment period

The recruitment will be reported as the number of participants recruited by each site.

Feasibility criteria for recruitment will be satisfied if we recruit 8 people per site in five months.

RetentionThrough study completion (18 weeks)

The retention will be reported as the proportion of participants who complete the final assessment out of the total number of participants.

The feasibility criteria for retention will be satisfied if 80% of participants complete the trial.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Resource useBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

The economic evaluation will be conducted from health system and societal perspectives using questionnaires. Participants will complete EQ5D-3L as a measure of morbidity and multiply it by mortality to achieve a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimate per intervention. Multiplying resources collected by jurisdictional unit costs in Canadian dollars will determine the total cost. The ratio of incremental costs between arms will be calculated, determined by trial resources, and outcome (QALY) to achieve a cost per life year gained outcome.

ImplementationAt Week 18

The participant and provider experiences will be captured via semi-structured interviews. Participants will report adherence to the prescribed exercise using Wibbi app or a log (participant preference). With consent, two sessions per site, selected at random, will be recorded. Research assistant will complete a checklist to assess intervention fidelity.

Pain levelBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will be administered the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form to assess pain. The wording of the questions will be modified to adapt them to the context specific to our population. The mean score of the four items will be calculated to determine pain severity, ranging from 0 to 10. The pain interference will be calculated as the mean score of 10 items that measure the impact of pain on various activities, ranging from 0 to 10.

Falls self-efficacyBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will complete Short Falls Self-Efficacy questionnaire to assess fear of falling. The cut-points for degrees of concern about falling are established wherein scores 7 and 8 represent a low concern, 9 to 13 indicate a moderate concern, and 28 to 64 represent a high concern for falls.

MoodBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will complete Patient Health Questionnaire-8 to measure depression. The total score is calculated by adding up the scores of each item, and ranges from 0 to 24. The cut points for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression are 5, 10, 15, and 20, respectively.

Physical activityBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will complete Physical Activity for Elderly questionnaire to measure physical activity levels. The total score is calculated using an algorithm that multiplies activity weights by activity frequencies. Higher scores correspond to greater physical activity levels.

Nutrition riskBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will complete SCREEN-14 tool to measure nutrition risk. The score ranges from 0 to 64. Individuals who receive a score less than 50 are considered nutritionally at risk. A score of 2 or less from an individual response may help understand the items that put individuals at nutrition risk.

BalanceBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will perform a series of balance tests (side-by-side stand, semi-tandem stand, tandem stand) to assess balance. The total balance score ranges from 0 to 4 wherein the higher scores represent greater balance.

Maintenance (exercise adherence at Week 18)Baseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Maintenance will be reported as the adherence to the exercise sessions at the end of 18-week follow-up for immediate group only.

Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for OsteoporosisBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will complete the 41-item Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) to measure quality of life. The total score is calculated by summing each item in the questionnaire and then transforming the score to a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a greater quality of life.

FallsBaseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 16

The number of people who fall and rate of falls will be recorded using monthly fall logs. Participants will self-report their falls.

Fear of movementBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will complete Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia to assess the participants' fear of movement related to the pain. The total score ranges from 17 to 68. The lowest score of 17 represents no or little fear of movement whereas the higher scores indicate a greater fear of movement.

ReachAt Baseline

Reach will be reported using PROGRESS-Plus (Place; Race/ethnicity/culture/language; Occupation; Out of Work, Gender and sex; Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital) factors to describe participants. The number of individuals recruited who are ≤12 weeks versus \>12 weeks post-vertebral fracture, and those who attend outcome assessments in-person or virtually will be presented.

AdoptionOver the 5-month recruitment period

Adoption will be reported as the number of screened and enrolled patients by referral source. The fracture verification process will also be assessed (i.e., the length of time to obtain radiology reports and number of people with ambiguous radiology reports).

Physical functionBaseline, Week 9, and Week 18

Participants will perform the 30 Second Chair Stand Test to assess lower extremity muscle power. Scores vary depending on age and sex.

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Arthritis Research Canada

🇨🇦

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Geras Centre for Aging Research

🇨🇦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Unity Health Toronto

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

McGill University Health Centre

🇨🇦

Montréal, Quebec, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath