A study to compare spinal anesthesia in caesarean section when drug is given according to height and weight versus a fixed dose.
- Conditions
- Encounter for cesarean delivery without indication,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/04/042328
- Lead Sponsor
- Saveetha medical college hospital
- Brief Summary
The preferred choice of anaesthesia for conducting emergency and elective caesarean section is spinal considering the various physiological changes in pregnancy. Hypotension still persists as a major problem during spinal anaesthesia.
Various strategies employed to prevent hypotension are preloading with intravenous fluid, leg elevation, prophylactic administration of vasopressors, using lower dose of local anaesthetic agents, use of additives like clonidine, opioids etc.
The dose of bupivacaine is reduced in obstetric patients due to increased sensitivity of neural tissue, alteration in CSF volume, weight gain and exaggerated lordosis. As a result of these factors which ultimately result in significant cephalad spread resulting in higher level of blockade causing maternal discomfort and hypotension.
The dose of bupivacaine for patients undergoing LSCS under spinal is around 12mg (12.78 mg for normal weight and 11.86 mg for obese population). Studies have proved that dose of bupivacaine based on height for spinal anaesthesia in LSCS patients is 0.06mg/cm.
The use of 8-10mg bupivacaine has been associated with lesser incidences of hypotension but greater intraoperative need for analgesia to dampen the pain.
This results in a wide range of dose of bupivacaine administered to these patients.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of block achieved with height and weight adjusted dose of bupivacaine with fentanyl versus a fixed dosage of bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective caesarean section patients so as to find the optimum dose of drug required for adequate anaesthesia, which in turn will reduce the usage of vasopressors.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Patient undergoing elective LSCS 2) Age 18-40 yrs 3) ASA II patients 4) Weight 50-90 kg 5) Height 140cm-180cm 6) Singleton pregnancy.
- Emergency caesarean section 2) Patients refusing spinal anesthesia 3) Infection at the site of regional blockade 4) Bleeding diathesis 5) Hypersensitivity to the study drug 6) Allergy to local anaesthetics 7) Neurological diseases 8) Spinal deformities.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method comparison of heart rate and blood pressure between the fixed dose of bupivacaine and bupivacaine based on Hartens chart Baseline, pre-spinal, post-spinal, 5mins, 15mins, 30mins, 60 mins, 120 mins, post anesthesia care unit
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of onset of sensory blockade in both the groups comparison of motor regression time every 15 minutes comparison of sensory regression every 15 minutes quality of block assessed by surgeon after surgery quality of Intraoperative analgesia assessed by patient once after surgery APGAR score of baby after baby delivery and at 5 minutes after delivery complications every 10 minutes
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Saveetha Medical College and Hospital
🇮🇳Chennai, TAMIL NADU, India
Saveetha Medical College and Hospital🇮🇳Chennai, TAMIL NADU, Indiarohit kamalPrincipal investigator9003133672rohankamal@gmail.com