MedPath

Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Direct Current and Muscle Fatigue Stimulation on Muscle Fatigue

Not Applicable
Conditions
Fatigue
Interventions
Device: transcranial direct current stimulation
Registration Number
NCT06389162
Lead Sponsor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can impact muscle fatigue. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does tDCS of the left DLPFC increase the time that a fatiguing contraction can be maintained?

2. Does tDCS of the left DLPFC decrease the rate of increase of muscle activity, force error, and standard deviation of force during a fatiguing contraction.

Researchers will compare tDCS of the left DLPFC to a SHAM stimulation (a type of stimulation that feels like real tDCS but does not elicit physiological effects) to see if tDCS of the left DLPFC works to reduce the progression of muscle fatigue.

Participants will:

Performing two experimental sessions held 3-10 days apart (usually 7 days) Perform a 9 hole pegboard test, maximum voluntary contractions, and a fatiguing contraction.

Detailed Description

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can increase endurance time in lower body tasks. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the effect of DLPFC-tDCS on the time to task failure (TTF) of a fatiguing contraction performed by hand muscles. The study will use a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, crossover design with each participant performing two experimental sessions held 3-7 days apart. The only difference between the two sessions will be the type of stimulation (tDCS or SHAM; counterbalanced) applied concurrent with the fatiguing contraction. The fatiguing contraction will involve gripping a manipulandum with the index finger and thumb. This will be accomplished by using a precision grip and matching an isometric target equal to 15% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) for as long as possible until task failure.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Able to provide informed consent
  2. Free from any neurological or psychiatric condition
  3. Age between 18-50 years old
  4. Right-handed (as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. An uncontrolled medical condition (i.e. hypertension, diabetes, etc)
  2. Metal in the skull or the eye, such as a cardiac pacemaker, brain stimulator, shrapnel, surgical metal, clips in the brain, cochlear implants, and metal fragments in the eye.
  3. Hearing loss diagnosed by a doctor and requiring a hearing aid. Have had a brain tumor, a stroke, head trauma, epilepsy or a history of seizures, have a neurological disorder, a movement disorder, or have a head injury that involved being passed out for more than a few seconds.
  4. History of migraines
  5. implanted defibrillator or implanted neurostimulator
  6. pregnant or thought to be pregnant. This must be an exclusion criterion as there are few medical papers available regarding the effects of tDCS on the unborn child/fetus or expectant mother. Thus, if you are pregnant or thought to be pregnant you cannot participate in the study. If you find out you are pregnant in the week timeframe between experiment 1 and experiment 2, you should withdraw from the study as we cannot perform the second experiment in that case.
  7. Not done a similar fatigue study in the laboratory in the last 7 days.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
tDCStranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
SHAMtranscranial direct current stimulationSHAM transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to Task Failure5 months

The time in seconds that a fatiguing contraction can be held

Fatigue Index5 months

The percent decline in force between the maximum voluntary contractions performed before and after the fatiguing contraction

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Force error5 months

The average force error during the fatiguing contraction.

Standard deviation of force5 months

The average standard deviation of force during the fatiguing contraction.

Average EMG activity5 months

The average EMG activity of the first dorsal interosseus muscle during the fatiguing contraction.

9 Hole Pegboard Test5 months

9 Hole Pegboard Test time before and after the fatiguing contraction

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Nevada Las Vegas

🇺🇸

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath