Investigating the Relationship Between Directional Microphones, Compression, and Working Memory in Realistic Spatial Conditions.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Enrollment
- 42
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Speech Intelligibility (Percent Correct Scores)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this project is to determine whether the selection of hearing aid settings should be based in part on an individual's cognitive characteristics (specifically, working memory). We anticipate the outcomes of this study to be applicable to realistic listening conditions.
Detailed Description
Hearing aids have specialized features to improve access to sounds for the hearing-impaired listener. The choice of appropriate hearing aid settings is integral to the hearing rehabilitative process. Researchers and clinicians have been influenced by previous work showing that individual cognitive abilities, including working memory, are associated with hearing aid benefit, especially in adverse listening conditions. However, previous research is limited to omnidirectional microphone settings and unrealistic listening conditions. Such conditions fail to recognize that most hearing aids are fit with directional processing that may improve the listening environment, and that typical environments contain speech and noise signals in a range of spatial locations. Therefore, the broad goal of this research is to understand how patient variables interact with hearing aid signal processing in realistic listening conditions in order to effectively treat hearing-impaired individuals in communications situations that are most important to them.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Factorial
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description
The participant will be blinded to the hearing aid features being adjusted. The order of presentation of the hearing aid features will be randomized across participants, using a Latin-Square design. The outcomes assessor(s) (who score speech intelligibility) will also be blinded to the conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •> =18 years of age; any sex
- •Sensorineural hearing loss with pure-tone thresholds between 25-70 decibel hearing level (dB HL) at octave frequencies between 250 and 3000 Hz
- •Speak English as their primary language
- •Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (<=20/50)
- •Participants will be in good health (self-report)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Clinically significant unstable or progressive medical conditions
- •Participants who score < 23 on the cognitive screening test (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
- •Evidence of conductive hearing loss or middle ear issues
- •Significant history of otologic or neurologic disorders
- •Evidence of significant asymmetry between ears
- •Non-English-speaking or non-native English speaking
Arms & Interventions
Setting 1
Hearing aid features presented in this arm include omnidirectional microphone settings and fast-acting compression
Intervention: Hearing aid (Device)
Setting 2
Hearing aid features presented in this arm include omnidirectional microphone settings and slow-acting compression
Intervention: Hearing aid (Device)
Setting 3
Hearing aid features presented in this arm include directional microphone settings and fast-acting compression
Intervention: Hearing aid (Device)
Setting 4
Hearing aid features presented in this arm include directional microphone settings and slow-acting compression
Intervention: Hearing aid (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Speech Intelligibility (Percent Correct Scores)
Time Frame: ~20 mins for each intervention over the course of 1-2 days
Listeners will listen to and repeat recorded low-context sentences mixed with noise from different spatial locations. Speech intelligibility will be measured immediately following hearing aid fitting. Scoring is determined by percentage of words repeated correctly. Scores range from 0-100% (higher score indicates better performance). This task may take up to 1-2 visits (\~ 2 hours each) for different combinations of hearing aid features. The device will only be worn in the laboratory for the duration of the experimental task and will be retrieved by the investigator at the end of each visit.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Pamela Souza
Professor
Northwestern University