跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00259142
NCT00259142终止不适用

Community Acceptability and Cost-effectiveness of Two Drug Distribution Methods for Home Based Management of Fevr in Kayunga District, Uganda

DBL -Institute for Health Research and Development1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,314 人开始时间: 2005年11月1日最近更新:
适应症
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
发起方
入组人数
1,314
试验地点
1
主要终点
See detailed description

研究概览

简要总结

Malaria remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality particularly among children < 5 years in Uganda. Due to inaccessibility many children die before they reach the health facility. The Home Based Management of Fever (HBMF) strategy was adopted in Uganda as a mean to improve access to early and appropriate treatment of fever at community level. Pre-packed chloroquine with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (HOMAPAK) is provided through Community Drug Distributors(CDDs). Initial evaluation showed underutilization of the CDDs (15%). This cast doubt on community acceptability, accessibility as well as its feasibility and cost effectiveness. This 3-year project intends to compare community acceptability and cost effectiveness of two HOMAPAK distribution methods. The current CDD-based HOMAPAK distribution versus home-based HOMAPAK distribution. The study hypothesis is that "home-based HOMAPAK distribution is more acceptable to the community and more cost effective than the CDD based HOMAPAK A non randomised community study will be conducted in two sub-counties of Mukono district. In the control arm, HOMAPAKs will be distributed through the CDDs while in the intervention arm, HOMAPAKs will be directly distributed to the caretakers in the homes. The study population are caretakers and their children < 5 years. At baseline a survey (Phase 1) with a sample size 657 in each study area will assess the common drugs stocked at home to treat malaria and the health seeking behaviour for malaria for children < 5 years and to determine the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and anaemia among children < 5 years. Phase 2 includes the intervention. The villages will be assigned to either the control or intervention arm. Anaemia and malaria parasitaemia among children with fever will be assessed through active case finding. The impact of either distribution system on accessibility, acceptability, sustainability, compliance, cost effectiveness and malaria morbidity will be assessed during the evaluation phase. Health education messages on malaria prevention and treatment will be given to both communities. Drug misuse will be limited by distributing HOMAPAKs according to the number of children <5years in each household. HOMAPAK will only be replenished after the caretaker returns a used packet to the CDD.

详细描述

The hypothesis is that distributing HOMAPAK directly to caretakers is more acceptable to the community, cost effective and results in reduced malaria morbidity among children < 5 years than distribution through CDDs.

General Objective:

To compare the communities malaria seeking behaviour in the two drug distribution methods of HOMAPAK in order to provide information that can be used to enhance the HBMF strategy.

Specific Objectives:

  1. To assess trends in the types and numbers of antimalarials stocked for use among children < 5 years in the two study areas
  2. To assess the patterns of health seeking behaviour in the community for fever among children under five years of age.
  3. To assess the incidence of malaria, and the associated morbidity (anaemia) in the two study areas.
  4. To compare community acceptability of the two drug distribution methods of HOMAPAK in the aspects of, utilisation of the services, drug compliance, coverage and accessibility.
  5. To assess the cost and compare cost effectiveness of the two drug distribution methods of the HOMAPAK on malaria morbidity in the community.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 59 Months(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • children 0-59 months with fever

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

See detailed description

次要结局

  • See detailed description

研究者

发起方
DBL -Institute for Health Research and Development
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Acceptability and Cost Effectiveness of Home Based... | 临床试验